All,
Please review this backport of the fix for 8031709 to jdk8u/jdk8u-dev.
The fix is the very same as the one Erik did in jdk9:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-January/011534.html
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/rev/690bb11e1df2
Patch below (new generated-configur
Hiya Mikael ,
On 10/07/14 08:54, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
All,
Please review this backport of the fix for 8031709 to jdk8u/jdk8u-dev.
The fix is the very same as the one Erik did in jdk9:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-January/011534.html
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9
Hello Mikael:
All,
Please review this backport of the fix for 8031709 to
jdk8u/jdk8u-dev. The fix is the very same as the one Erik did in jdk9:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2014-January/011534.html
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/rev/690bb11e1df2
Patch below (new
Hi all ,
Could anyone tell me if there's a tie in between the
--with-import-hotspot & --with-boot-jdk options, I ask purely because,
although I can run a successful truly vanilla OJDK build, all attempts
fail if I attempt to use either, or both of, the --with-import-hotspot
&/or --with-boot-j
The makefile changes look fine to me. (The use of OPENJDK as part of the
variable names seems excessive but that's not something your patch adds or
changes)
Mike
On Jul 9 2014, at 23:55 , Petr Pchelko wrote:
> Hello, Build Team.
>
> This is a reminder. Could you please review the build part
On 11/07/2014 2:09 AM, pointo1d wrote:
Hi all ,
Could anyone tell me if there's a tie in between the
--with-import-hotspot & --with-boot-jdk options, I ask purely because,
although I can run a successful truly vanilla OJDK build, all attempts
fail if I attempt to use either, or both of, the --wi
