Hello,
I would certainly like to have these files updated, but unfortunately
the license on these files changed from GPL2 to GPL3. This essentially
means that the switch is non trivial from a legal perspective and the
impression I've received when I last inquired about updating these files
wa
On 10/11/14 08:08, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> I would certainly like to have these files updated, but
> unfortunately the license on these files changed from GPL2 to
> GPL3. This essentially means that the switch is non trivial from a
> legal perspective and the impression I've received when I last
>
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would certainly like to have these files updated, but unfortunately the
> license on these files changed from GPL2 to GPL3. This essentially means
> that the switch is non trivial from a legal perspective and the impression
> I'v
On 2014-11-10 10:27, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
I would certainly like to have these files updated, but unfortunately the
license on these files changed from GPL2 to GPL3. This essentially means
that the switch is non trivial from a lega
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Erik Joelsson
wrote:
>
> On 2014-11-10 10:27, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Erik Joelsson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would certainly like to have these files updated, but unfortunately the
>>> license on these files changed
Hi again David ,
In addition to changes in the GensrcX11Wrappers.gmk, I can't see any way
to get the correct output with also modifying WrapperGenerator.java, would
I be correct in this ?
TIA & best rgds ,
--
Dave Pointon FIAP MBCS
Now I saw, tho' too late, the folly of beginning a work b
* Christian Thalinger [2014-11-07 13:11]:
> > On Nov 7, 2014, at 9:55 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> > On 11/07/2014 05:42 PM, Christian Thalinger wrote:
> >> common/autoconf/flags.m4
> >>
> >> +aarch64)
> >> + ZERO_ARCHFLAG=""
> >> + ;;
> >>
> >> Why is this required on aarch64 but no
Technically even Mavericks, but really it's Xcode 5/6... I never backported my
Xcode 5 changes to 8u. It was on my list for a while but never accomplished due
to lack of time.
Is there interest in doing so? If so, I can try to find the time to scrape up a
backport.
The final webrevs for JDK9
Greetings,
I have a Solaris Full Debug Symbols (FDS) fix ready for review.
Yes, it is a small fix, but it is in Makefiles so feel free to
run screaming from the room... :-) On the plus side the fix does
delete two work around source files (Coleen would say that's a
Good Thing (TM)!)
The fix is
> On Nov 6, 2014, at 17:13, Magnus Ihse Bursie
> wrote:
>
> A longer answer is that we're currently working on getting jdk9 to compile on
> Yosemite.
Isn't it already compiling? I am on Yosemite and I can compile both openjdk and
closedjdk successfully.
Of course, I don't compile deploy etc
10 matches
Mail list logo
