On 2/06/2015 11:50 PM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 15:21, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hello,
Hate to disturb you again but I got yet another show stopper for my
Solaris build:
Generating solaris_amd64_docs/jvmti.html
Creating libverify.so from 2 file(s)
Creating libjava.so from 60 file(
On 2015-06-02 17:27, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build jdk9 under the current Solaris 11.2 version.
Which version of the Solaris Studio should be installed for that? The
readme-builds states:
...
At a minimum, the Studio 12 Update 1 Compilers (containing version
5.10 of the C and
On 2015-06-02 18:50, Jan Lahoda wrote:
Hello Eric,
Thanks for the change, this seems definitely better to me. I've folded
your change that into my patch. An updated version (just langtools
this time):
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~jlahoda/8072480/webrev.04/langtools/
Thanks!
From a build pers
On 6/3/2015 11:28 AM, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-06-02 17:27, Semyon Sadetsky wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to build jdk9 under the current Solaris 11.2 version.
Which version of the Solaris Studio should be installed for that? The
readme-builds states:
...
At a minimum, the Studio 12 Update
Not all versions of gcc support -fstack-protector. We should check that
it is accepted as an argument before adding it to the flags.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081692
WebRev inline:
diff --git a/common/autoconf/flags.m4 b/common/autoconf/flags.m4
--- a/common/autoconf/flags.
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-06-03 14:33, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Not all versions of gcc support -fstack-protector. We should check
that it is accepted as an argument before adding it to the flags.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8081692
WebRev inline:
diff --git a/common
Magnus:
Looks good to me as well.
Tim
On 06/03/15 06:12, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-06-03 14:33, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Not all versions of gcc support -fstack-protector. We should check
that it is accepted as an argument before adding it to the flags.
Bug: ht
My understanding is that given a properly configured 'dist-clean' will behave
as noted:
rm -r build
sh configure
make dist-clean
find build -mindepth 1
# no output
However, instead I get 3 files:
build/macosx-x86_64-normal-server-release
build/macosx-x86_64-normal-server-release/build.log
build/
Correct, if the makefile related changes are removed then no need for
build team to review 7191662 webrev anymore.
There are other discussions ongoing and we should be able to reach a
decision in a day or two.
Will update the list again.
Thanks,
Valerie
On 06/01/15 16:39, Magnus Ihse Bursie w
On 2015-06-03 19:14, Dan Smith wrote:
My understanding is that given a properly configured 'dist-clean' will behave
as noted:
rm -r build
sh configure
make dist-clean
find build -mindepth 1
# no output
However, instead I get 3 files:
build/macosx-x86_64-normal-server-release
build/macosx-x86_6
Joe,
These lines in langtools/test/TEST.groups look like they belong, with
appropriate tweaking, in langtools/test/Makefile
37 # Support for invoking tiered testing via the Makefile
38 #langtools_tier1 = :tier1
39 #langtools_tier2 = :tier2
40 #langtools_tier3 = :tier3
Or more specifi
Cross posting to build-dev for possible insight regarding Jon's last
paragraph below.
On 6/3/15 8:13 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>
> On 06/03/2015 04:27 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>> Hi, As part of my test I need to build a simple DLL and then load it
>> from my test class. Can jtreg build the DLL or
On 6/3/15 8:43 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
> Cross posting to build-dev for possible insight regarding Jon's last
> paragraph below.
>
> On 6/3/15 8:13 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> On 06/03/2015 04:27 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
>>> Hi, As part of my test I need to build a simple DLL and then load it
>>>
Peter,
On 4/06/2015 11:43 AM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Cross posting to build-dev for possible insight regarding Jon's last
paragraph below.
See jdk/make/test/JtregNative.gmk and other references to test-image.
David
On 6/3/15 8:13 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 06/03/2015 04:27 PM, Pete Brunet
On 4/06/2015 12:33 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
On 6/3/15 8:43 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Cross posting to build-dev for possible insight regarding Jon's last
paragraph below.
On 6/3/15 8:13 PM, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
On 06/03/2015 04:27 PM, Pete Brunet wrote:
Hi, As part of my test I need to build a
Magnus,
You missed the hotspot side of this:
./solaris/makefiles/gcc.make: DEBUG_CFLAGS += -fstack-protector-all
--param ssp-buffer-size=1
./bsd/makefiles/gcc.make:DEBUG_CFLAGS += -fstack-protector-all
--param ssp-buffer-size=1
./linux/makefiles/gcc.make:DEBUG_CFLAGS += -fstack-protec
16 matches
Mail list logo
