On 28/10/15 18:50, Martin Buchholz wrote:
> I'll buy that - it's an "easy" job, but still a job for a compiler writer.
>
> Perhaps x32 has less benefit for java programs because jits are already
> free to generate code that uses 32-bit pointers but takes advantage of the
> x86_64 instruction set?
If we specify e.g. --without-cups on a platform where cups is neither
needed nor used, we will get a warning that --with-cups is ignored. In
fact, specifying --without-X when X is not needed is the default and it
should just be silently skipped by.
Bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK
Hi,
Quick question: I have to use Java9 API in sun.misc.WhiteBox, but right
now it is built using BOOT_JDK. Does the following change [1] look good?
The following dependency seems too conservative (depends on hotspot
which is not necessary):
build-test-lib: $(JAVA_TARGETS)
but I haven't
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-10-28 22:03, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
The build system has not been good at separating LIBS from LDFLAGS. In
fact, when we started doing this, the name "LDFLAGS_SUFFIX" was used
for what is traditionally called LIBS. This unwieldy name has
unfortunately been k
Looks good to me.
/Erik
On 2015-10-29 11:39, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
If we specify e.g. --without-cups on a platform where cups is neither
needed nor used, we will get a warning that --with-cups is ignored. In
fact, specifying --without-X when X is not needed is the default and
it should ju
Hello,
On 2015-10-29 14:43, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Hi,
Quick question: I have to use Java9 API in sun.misc.WhiteBox, but
right now it is built using BOOT_JDK. Does the following change [1]
look good?
The changes look ok, but may impact build times as the building of tests
will have to wait
Erik:
Looks good to me as well.
Tim
On 10/28/15 04:09, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Looks good to me.
Nice solution in basics.m4!
/Magnus
28 okt. 2015 kl. 10:47 skrev Erik Joelsson :
I've noticed that on some linux systems (maybe even all OEL6 and 7), there is a
/usr/bin/gmake binary. Confi