On 30/11/15 07:59, Volker Simonis wrote:
If it's not there, you should just sync valhalla with the latest jdk9 or
use VS2013 or newer.
Valhalla has been synced last week to jdk9 b93, so it should be fairly
recent. But it seems like this particular fix is very recent and hasn't
made it to b93.
I've pushed the fix indicated by Volker (thanks!). Let me know if you
see some improvements.
Maurizio
On 30/11/15 10:43, Maurizio Cimadamore wrote:
On 30/11/15 07:59, Volker Simonis wrote:
If it's not there, you should just sync valhalla with the latest jdk9 or
use VS2013 or newer.
Valhalla
On 2015-11-26 15:19, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
I uploaded a new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8036003/webrev.04/
I implemented --with-native-debug-symbols and
--enable-java-debug-symbols in it.
And I deprecated --enable-debug-symbols and --enable-zip-debug-info .
Hi Yasu
On 2015-11-30 05:23, David Holmes wrote:
Hi Sasha,
Trying to trace through this is somewhat complex :)
So ...
At the top level if we see ppc64le then we set VAR_CPU to ppc64le
instead of ppc64. However, once we get into hotspot build we want ARCH
to be ppc64 again (in hotspot-spec.gmk.in)
On 2015-11-25 17:53, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
On 25.11.2015 11:36, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-11-25 10:39, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 25/11/2015 09:25, Jaroslav Bachorik wrote:
I don't think we can just repackage these interfaces - they are
remote API and we would break compatibility (
On 2015-10-20 16:05, Erik Helin wrote:
On 2015-10-14, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2015-10-09 14:09, Erik Helin wrote:
Hi all,
this patch adds a new configure variable: --with-test-jobs. The new
variable configures how many tests jobs we run concurrently (aka the
-concurrency flag to JTReg).
Hi Magnus,
I've uploaded new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ysuenaga/JDK-8036003/webrev.05/
If we do implement this flag, it should work as expected. If you believe this
is too hard to get right, I'm alright with fixing this as a separate bug.
Okay, I removed --enable-java-debug-symbo
Thank you every one. Now it works.
If you are interested, here is the crash report after attempting a simple
compilation(Worked in the past)
===Begin here ===
Information:11/30/2015 7:52 PM - Compilation completed with 1 error and 0
warnings in 9ms
E
SORRY !!!
forget to undo g1ParScanThreadState.cpp(46) with _scanner(g1h, *NULL*),
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 7:58 PM Boaz Nahum wrote:
> Thank you every one. Now it works.
>
> If you are interested, here is the crash report after attempting a simple
> compilation(Worked in the past)
> ===Begin her
