Hi David,
Does "new hotspot build" mean JEP 284?
If it so and this issue does not occur on JEP 284, I will close this issue.
Thanks,
Yasumasa
2016/03/07 16:57 "David Holmes" :
> Hi Yasumasa,
>
> On 7/03/2016 1:38 PM, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > When I build fastdebug JDK (--enab
Hello Yasumasa,
Yes, it is indeed JEP 284 and I have verified that the new build there
works as expected with the "internal" setting.
If you like, you can take it for a spin yourself by cloning
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/build-infra/jdk9. It should be in a pretty
good shape right now on Linu
Hi Erik,
If you like, you can take it for a spin yourself by cloning
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/build-infra/jdk9. It should be in a pretty good
shape right now on Linux.
Thanks! It looks good to me.
BTW, Does build-infra use hotspot/make/linux/makefiles/vm.make ?
vm.make have a bug in this
Hello Yasumasa,
In build-infra, we still have the old Hotspot build present for
reference in hotspot/make. The new build currently resides in
hotspot/makefiles. Basically no files in hotspot/make are used by the
new build. After we switch in JDK 9, we will have both build systems
available fo
Thanks Erik, I understood.
I closed this issue with Won't Fix.
Yasumasa
On 2016/03/07 23:36, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Yasumasa,
In build-infra, we still have the old Hotspot build present for reference in
hotspot/make. The new build currently resides in hotspot/makefiles. Basically
no fi
Dave,
Just to tie up the loose end about the default JSObject constructor: No
it cannot be package private. JavaFX WebView extends this class.
-- Kevin
Alan Bateman wrote:
On 05/03/2016 18:54, David DeHaven wrote:
I've updated the webrev, hopefully one last time with feedback from
Joe Da
>>
>> Is there any other, easy recommended way how to deal with this on for 8u.
>> I’d like to avoid having to deal at all with JDK9 at this point. Perhaps
>> someone has a correctly built 32 bit dll lying around...?
>
> You can just clone jdk9 and use the --with-freetype-src to have the config
>>
>> BTW—Something that puzzles me but probably has a straight forward
>> explanation: Why is there no freetype.dll in the pre-built JDKs (either 8 or
>> 9)? Shouldn’t that be in there somewhere? I was thinking that would be a
>> great source for a correctly built binary lib..
>
> If by "pre-
On 03/07/2016 08:11 AM, Hendrik Schreiber wrote:
- System Setup: freetype is listed as a requirement for Linux and Solaris. But
not for Windows.
I don't think that is completely accurate. There is some additional mention
in Unix sections regarding what to install to make your life easier,
but
>> I've updated the webrev, hopefully one last time with feedback from Joe
>> Darcy.
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/8132743/webrev.2/
>>
>> - Relocated package Javadoc to above the package declaration in
>> package-info.java
>> - Reworded the Javadoc on the default JSObject ctor
>>
>>
> On Mar 7, 2016, at 17:50, Phil Race wrote:
>
> On 03/07/2016 08:11 AM, Hendrik Schreiber wrote:
>> - System Setup: freetype is listed as a requirement for Linux and Solaris.
>> But not for Windows.
>
> I don't think that is completely accurate.
What I meant to point out is, that the README
11 matches
Mail list logo
