Thanks Gustavo,
the change looks good.
So now we're just waiting for another review from somebody of the aarch64 folks.
Once we have that and the fc-request is approved I'll push the changes.
Regards,
Volker
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Gustavo Romero
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm re-sending d
On 29/11/16 09:41, Volker Simonis wrote:
> Thanks Gustavo,
>
> the change looks good.
>
> So now we're just waiting for another review from somebody of the aarch64
> folks.
> Once we have that and the fc-request is approved I'll push the changes.
One thing I don't understand:
cos 0.17098435541
Hi Andrew,
On 29-11-2016 13:35, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 29/11/16 09:41, Volker Simonis wrote:
>> Thanks Gustavo,
>>
>> the change looks good.
>>
>> So now we're just waiting for another review from somebody of the aarch64
>> folks.
>> Once we have that and the fc-request is approved I'll push th
On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Gustavo Romero
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 29-11-2016 13:35, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> On 29/11/16 09:41, Volker Simonis wrote:
>>> Thanks Gustavo,
>>>
>>> the change looks good.
>>>
>>> So now we're just waiting for another review from somebody of the aarch64
>>> fol
On 29/11/16 18:06, Volker Simonis wrote:
> @Andrew: are you fine with Gustavos latest version of the change?
Sure. The StrictMath versions all seem to give the same results.
Andrew.
Hi Erik, Volker, Andrew
On 29-11-2016 16:15, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 29/11/16 18:06, Volker Simonis wrote:
>> @Andrew: are you fine with Gustavos latest version of the change?
>
> Sure. The StrictMath versions all seem to give the same results.
>
> Andrew.
>
Thanks for reviewing the change!
Hi Volker et. al.,
Was a bug opened to track this ? I still see these files around
http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/jdk/file/ff45c582ca8a/src/java.base/aix/native/libjli
Would you like me to create a bug for you ?
Thanks
Kumar
On 9/29/2016 9:59 AM, Volker Simonis wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 201
