* Magnus Ihse Bursie:
>> I want to fix some oversight in building the documentation (where
>> content derived from open builds is incorrectly labeled as closed),
>> and it would be nice to control the new behavior with such a flag.
> Hm? I'm not sure what this means, but that sounds like a proper
Hi Erik,
On 10/18/19 2:54 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Leo,
When removing a JVM feature from the VALID_JVM_FEATURES list, it needs
to be added to the DEPRECATED_JVM_FEATURES list. Deprecated here means
removed here, but configure will still accept the argument (with a
warning).
Are we re
On 2019-10-21 09:20, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Magnus Ihse Bursie:
I want to fix some oversight in building the documentation (where
content derived from open builds is incorrectly labeled as closed),
and it would be nice to control the new behavior with such a flag.
Hm? I'm not sure what this m
On 2019-10-21 09:43, Per Liden wrote:
Hi Erik,
On 10/18/19 2:54 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Leo,
When removing a JVM feature from the VALID_JVM_FEATURES list, it
needs to be added to the DEPRECATED_JVM_FEATURES list. Deprecated
here means removed here, but configure will still accept the
On 2019-10-21 02:46, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2019-10-21 09:43, Per Liden wrote:
Hi Erik,
On 10/18/19 2:54 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello Leo,
When removing a JVM feature from the VALID_JVM_FEATURES list, it
needs to be added to the DEPRECATED_JVM_FEATURES list. Deprecated
here means re
RFE: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8232080
CSR: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8232753
Webrev: https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~mr/rev/8232080/
This change implements jlink plugins, and associated changes in the VM
and libraries, to support the following new jlink options:
- --
