Looks good.
/Erik
On 2019-12-16 04:27, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
please review this patch[1] which makes the JMH behave more
in line with expectations when adding multiple flags using
the VM_OPTIONS and JAVA_OPTIONS control variables.
E.g., these fail before the patch:
make test TEST=... MIC
Thanks, Erik!
/Claes
On 2019-12-17 12:32, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Looks good.
/Erik
On 2019-12-16 04:27, Claes Redestad wrote:
Hi,
please review this patch[1] which makes the JMH behave more
in line with expectations when adding multiple flags using
the VM_OPTIONS and JAVA_OPTIONS control vari
Hi!
On 12/16/19 10:08 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> On 12/16/19 10:08 PM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>>
>> I’m not actually sure, but just to be on the safe side I’d prefer to add the
>> grouping.
>
> Okay, will do.
Updated revision here:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~glaubitz/8235960/web
Looks good.
Cheers,
Mikael
> On Dec 17, 2019, at 4:24 AM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 12/16/19 10:08 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> On 12/16/19 10:08 PM, Mikael Vidstedt wrote:
>>>
>>> I’m not actually sure, but just to be on the safe side I’d prefer to add
Hello, a small update from my side . I had (on Linux) for a couple of days
our jdk11u tests + benchmarks running with -Os instead of the usual
settings (-O3) .
With have (independent of -Os / -O3) a bit of variance in our benchmarks
( jbb15 , jvm2008, jvm98 ) .
However the benc
Hi Jon,
Looks good to me.
Hannes
> Am 13.12.2019 um 22:21 schrieb Jonathan Gibbons :
>
> Please review a change to the JDK-specific taglet used to generate links to
> the JLS and JVMS specifications. The change is to allow instances of these
> tags to be used inline as well as in the series
Hi August , thanks for pointing to your webpage, very interesting !
We did our builds+tests/benchmarks with gcc 7.4.0 , what compiler+version
did you use?
Probably I should look a bit more into Dacapo (we used that one in the past too
sometimes).
Best regards, Matthias
>
> I publish
