On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 23:32:32 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> The fix for JDK-8246112 put the -lrt link flag in the wrong place, causing it
> to appear too early in the linker command-line. This changes puts it in the
> right place.
>
> Contributed by: Matthias Klose (~doko)
>
> Testing:
>- l
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 23:32:32 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> The fix for JDK-8246112 put the -lrt link flag in the wrong place, causing it
> to appear too early in the linker command-line. This changes puts it in the
> right place.
>
> Contributed by: Matthias Klose (~doko)
>
> Testing:
>- l
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 23:32:32 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> The fix for JDK-8246112 put the -lrt link flag in the wrong place, causing it
> to appear too early in the linker command-line. This changes puts it in the
> right place.
>
> Contributed by: Matthias Klose (~doko)
>
> Testing:
>- l
Dear all,
would somebody please be willing to sponsor this backport patch?
Thank you,
Lutz
On 14.04.21, 19:05, "jdk-updates-dev on behalf of Schmidt, Lutz"
wrote:
Thanks for reviewing, Paul!
Best,
Lutz
On 14.04.21, 19:01, "Hohensee, Paul" wrote:
Lgtm.
Th
I'll sponsor.
-Original Message-
From: "Schmidt, Lutz"
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 at 7:16 AM
To: "Hohensee, Paul" , "jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net"
Cc: build-dev
Subject: RE: [11u] RFR(M): 8233787 backport: Break cycle in vm_version* includes
Dear all,
would somebody please b
Pushed.
-Original Message-
From: jdk-updates-dev on behalf of
"Hohensee, Paul"
Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 at 10:55 AM
To: "Schmidt, Lutz" , "jdk-updates-...@openjdk.java.net"
Cc: build-dev
Subject: RE: [11u] RFR(M): 8233787 backport: Break cycle in vm_version* includes
I'll spo
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 21:13:51 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
> Please review the changes to support CLDR version 39. The vast majority of
> the changes are purely data changes from Unicode. The only change affected in
> logic was in `CLDRLocaleProviderAdapter.java`, where it needed to deal with
> CLDR'
Please review this PR that intents to make sealed classes a final feature in
Java. This PR contains compiler and VM changes. In line with similar PRs, which
has made preview features final, this one is mostly removing preview related
comments from APIs plus options in test cases.
Thanks
--
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 02:11:10 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> Please review this PR that intents to make sealed classes a final feature in
>> Java. This PR contains compiler and VM changes. In line with similar PRs,
>> which has made preview features final, this one is mostly removing preview
>>
> Please review this PR that intents to make sealed classes a final feature in
> Java. This PR contains compiler and VM changes. In line with similar PRs,
> which has made preview features final, this one is mostly removing preview
> related comments from APIs plus options in test cases. Please
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 02:10:05 GMT, David Holmes wrote:
> Hi Vicente,
>
> Hotspot and hotspot tests all look fine. One query: why was this test removed?
>
> test/hotspot/jtreg/runtime/sealedClasses/AbstractSealedTest.java
>
> is that functionality tested elsewhere? (The other deleted test seemed
> Please review this PR that intents to make sealed classes a final feature in
> Java. This PR contains compiler and VM changes. In line with similar PRs,
> which has made preview features final, this one is mostly removing preview
> related comments from APIs plus options in test cases. Please
12 matches
Mail list logo
