> This is a preview of a patch implementing JEP 406: Pattern Matching for
> switch (Preview):
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213076
>
> The current draft of the specification is here:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep406/jep406-20210430/specs/patterns-switch-jls.html
>
> A
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:01:27 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is a preview of a patch implementing JEP 406: Pattern Matching for
>> switch (Preview):
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213076
>>
>> The current draft of the specification is here:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/je
> This is a preview of a patch implementing JEP 406: Pattern Matching for
> switch (Preview):
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213076
>
> The current draft of the specification is here:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep406/jep406-20210430/specs/patterns-switch-jls.html
>
> A
On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:19:06 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
> This patch overhauls the library loading mechanism used by the Foreign Linker
> API. We realized that, while handy, the *default* lookup abstraction
> (`LibraryLookup::ofDefault`) was behaving inconsistentlt across platforms.
>
> T
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:46:31 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is a preview of a patch implementing JEP 406: Pattern Matching for
>> switch (Preview):
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213076
>>
>> The current draft of the specification is here:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/je
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:53:42 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Now that the default behavior of JDK 17 is still
> `-Djava.security.manager=allow`, we can remove the
> `-Djavatest.security.noSecurityManager=true` option from the jtreg command
> line inside `RunTests.gmk`. Three problem-listed langtools
Now that the default behavior of JDK 17 is still
`-Djava.security.manager=allow`, we can remove the
`-Djavatest.security.noSecurityManager=true` option from the jtreg command line
inside `RunTests.gmk`. Three problem-listed langtools tests can also be
liberated.
-
Commit messages:
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:53:42 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Now that the default behavior of JDK 17 is still
> `-Djava.security.manager=allow`, we can remove the
> `-Djavatest.security.noSecurityManager=true` option from the jtreg command
> line inside `RunTests.gmk`. Three problem-listed langtools
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 16:10:02 GMT, Jonathan Gibbons wrote:
>> Now that the default behavior of JDK 17 is still
>> `-Djava.security.manager=allow`, we can remove the
>> `-Djavatest.security.noSecurityManager=true` option from the jtreg command
>> line inside `RunTests.gmk`. Three problem-listed l
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:53:42 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> Now that the default behavior of JDK 17 is still
> `-Djava.security.manager=allow`, we can remove the
> `-Djavatest.security.noSecurityManager=true` option from the jtreg command
> line inside `RunTests.gmk`. Three problem-listed langtools
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:46:31 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is a preview of a patch implementing JEP 406: Pattern Matching for
>> switch (Preview):
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213076
>>
>> The current draft of the specification is here:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/je
JDK-8264806 removed Graal sources from JDK and INCLUDE_GRAAL is not defined
anymore. We can now remove code added by JDK-8264874:
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/951f277a
Tested Tier1.
-
Commit messages:
- 8268272: Remove JDK-8264874 changes because Graal was removed.
Chang
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 17:40:48 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> JDK-8264806 removed Graal sources from JDK and INCLUDE_GRAAL is not defined
> anymore. We can now remove code added by JDK-8264874:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/951f277a
>
> Tested Tier1.
Marked as reviewed by erikj (Reviewe
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:46:31 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is a preview of a patch implementing JEP 406: Pattern Matching for
>> switch (Preview):
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213076
>>
>> The current draft of the specification is here:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/je
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 17:40:48 GMT, Vladimir Kozlov wrote:
> JDK-8264806 removed Graal sources from JDK and INCLUDE_GRAAL is not defined
> anymore. We can now remove code added by JDK-8264874:
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/951f277a
>
> Tested Tier1.
This pull request has now been integ
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 09:46:31 GMT, Jan Lahoda wrote:
>> This is a preview of a patch implementing JEP 406: Pattern Matching for
>> switch (Preview):
>> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213076
>>
>> The current draft of the specification is here:
>> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/je
> This is a preview of a patch implementing JEP 406: Pattern Matching for
> switch (Preview):
> https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8213076
>
> The current draft of the specification is here:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~gbierman/jep406/jep406-20210430/specs/patterns-switch-jls.html
>
> A
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 15:46:32 GMT, Paul Sandoz wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fixing typo.
>
> test/langtools/tools/javac/patterns/DisambiguateParenthesizedPattern.java
> line 72:
>
>> 70: Sw
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 18:23:28 GMT, Vicente Romero wrote:
>> Jan Lahoda has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Fixing typo.
>
> test/langtools/tools/javac/patterns/SealedTypeChanges.java line 71:
>
>> 69: }
>> 70:
>> 71: sealed i
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 20:00:07 GMT, jtfuller111
wrote:
> Fixing the zoom issue on IGV. I tested this on Windows and Linux and zooming
> now works as expected.
Hi, please send an e-mail to dalibor.to...@oracle.com so that I can mark your
account as verified.
-
PR: https://git.openjd
Fixing the zoom issue on IGV. I tested this on Windows and Linux and zooming
now works as expected.
-
Commit messages:
- IGV: Zooming now preserves the point currently centered
Changes: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/4291/files
Webrev: https://webrevs.openjdk.java.net/?repo
I got rid of `realpath` usage as discussed in
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/4190 and used `RelativePath` macro instead,
however there were quite a few problems with this macro, here's the example:
$(call RelativePath,/foo/bar,/foo/bar/baz) -> "..//foo/bar"
$(call RelativePath,/foo/bar/
On Fri, 4 Jun 2021 21:23:27 GMT, Nikita Gubarkov
wrote:
> I got rid of `realpath` usage as discussed in
> https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/4190 and used `RelativePath` macro
> instead, however there were quite a few problems with this macro, here's the
> example:
>
> $(call RelativePath,/
23 matches
Mail list logo
