On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 04:30:38 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> The time to get JDK 19 underway draws nigh, please review this usual set of
>> start-of-release updates, including CSRs for the javac and javax.lang.model
>> updates:
>>
>> JDK-8277512: Add SourceVersion.RELEASE_19
>> https://bugs.openjdk.j
> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-419 [1]. A more
> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
> process, is included as a separate comment.
>
> [1] - https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/419
Maurizio Cimadamore has updated the pull request
> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-419 [1]. A more
> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
> process, is included as a separate comment.
>
> [1] - https://openjdk.java.net/jeps/419
Maurizio Cimadamore has updated the pull request
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 03:26:51 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> 8277429: Conflicting jpackage static library name
Marked as reviewed by erikj (Reviewer).
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6485
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 04:30:38 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> The time to get JDK 19 underway draws nigh, please review this usual set of
>> start-of-release updates, including CSRs for the javac and javax.lang.model
>> updates:
>>
>> JDK-8277512: Add SourceVersion.RELEASE_19
>> https://bugs.openjdk.j
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 03:26:51 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> 8277429: Conflicting jpackage static library name
How come BUILD_JPACKAGE_APPLAUNCHEREXE results in a library? It sounds like an
executable...
That is, I realize this patch fixes the problem as described, I just don't
understand why i
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 03:26:51 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> 8277429: Conflicting jpackage static library name
The problem arises when running the "static-libs" build, where every library
and executable is just linked into a static-lib for downstream consumers
(Graal).
-
PR: https:
> PAC is an optional feature in AArch64 8.3 and is compulsory in v9. One
> of its uses is to protect against ROP based attacks. This is done by
> signing the Link Register whenever it is stored on the stack, and
> authenticating the value when it is loaded back from the stack. If an
> attacker were
On Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:23:07 GMT, Alan Hayward wrote:
>> PAC is an optional feature in AArch64 8.3 and is compulsory in v9. One
>> of its uses is to protect against ROP based attacks. This is done by
>> signing the Link Register whenever it is stored on the stack, and
>> authenticating the value
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 04:30:38 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> The time to get JDK 19 underway draws nigh, please review this usual set of
>> start-of-release updates, including CSRs for the javac and javax.lang.model
>> updates:
>>
>> JDK-8277512: Add SourceVersion.RELEASE_19
>> https://bugs.openjdk.j
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 03:26:51 GMT, Alexey Semenyuk wrote:
> 8277429: Conflicting jpackage static library name
This pull request has now been integrated.
Changeset: e3911a85
Author:Alexey Semenyuk
URL:
https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/commit/e3911a8532e9b93ba5e65c613bd79864485db5ce
St
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 04:30:38 GMT, Joe Darcy wrote:
>> The time to get JDK 19 underway draws nigh, please review this usual set of
>> start-of-release updates, including CSRs for the javac and javax.lang.model
>> updates:
>>
>> JDK-8277512: Add SourceVersion.RELEASE_19
>> https://bugs.openjdk.j
On Mon, 22 Nov 2021 12:09:30 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR contains the API and implementation changes for JEP-419 [1]. A more
>> detailed description of such changes, to avoid repetitions during the review
>> process, is included as a separate comment.
>>
>> [1] - https://openjd
13 matches
Mail list logo
