On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 16:49:08 GMT, Alan Hayward wrote:
> However, I'm not sure how to add to the release notes - I can't find any
> files or a process.
Ok, This part I understand now :)
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6334
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 00:25:43 GMT, Tyler Steele wrote:
>> Just in time for the holidays I have completed an implementation of the JFR
>> functionality for AIX. As a side note, this is my first submission to
>> OpenJDK 👋
>>
>> ### Implementation notes and alternatives considered
>>
>> After modi
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 12:56:12 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Current adhoc version build strings are not ideal. Some of the problems:
>> * A build number of "0" is inserted, which make the version string look
>> like it's an official build, at least when not reading carefully
>> * The version
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:00:50 GMT, TheShermanTanker wrote:
> If that's the case, I'm wondering if instead of changing
> `18-internal+0-adhoc.shade.jdk (18-internal)` to something like
> `18-internal-jdk-18+17-80-gcdf89304eaf.shade (18-internal)`, `build 18<+build
> number, not required>-internal
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:05:09 GMT, Aleksey Shipilev wrote:
> > If that's the case, I'm wondering if instead of changing
> > `18-internal+0-adhoc.shade.jdk (18-internal)` to something like
> > `18-internal-jdk-18+17-80-gcdf89304eaf.shade (18-internal)`, `build
> > 18<+build number, not required>-
Some dll/exe files end up having absolute path names embedded in them despite
the use of `--disable-absolute-paths-in-output` build option. This option
effectively translates into adding `-pathmap` to compilation lines, but doesn't
(always) achieve the desired effects. The reason for that is in
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 10:55:40 GMT, Maxim Kartashev wrote:
> Some dll/exe files end up having absolute path names embedded in them despite
> the use of `--disable-absolute-paths-in-output` build option. This option
> effectively translates into adding `-pathmap` to compilation lines, but
> doesn'
> Some dll/exe files end up having absolute path names embedded in them despite
> the use of `--disable-absolute-paths-in-output` build option. This option
> effectively translates into adding `-pathmap` to compilation lines, but
> doesn't (always) achieve the desired effects. The reason for tha
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 00:25:43 GMT, Tyler Steele wrote:
>> Just in time for the holidays I have completed an implementation of the JFR
>> functionality for AIX. As a side note, this is my first submission to
>> OpenJDK 👋
>>
>> ### Implementation notes and alternatives considered
>>
>> After modi
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 16:05:02 GMT, Tyler Steele wrote:
> I like the idea of adding the IBM copyright line more judiciously, and only
> when the changes I've made are significant. ProblemList.txt, where I've made
> a single line change, stands out in my mind as an example of where this line
> cou
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 14:57:04 GMT, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>> Some dll/exe files end up having absolute path names embedded in them
>> despite the use of `--disable-absolute-paths-in-output` build option. This
>> option effectively translates into adding `-pathmap` to compilation lines,
>> but does
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 15:34:42 GMT, Maxim Kartashev wrote:
>> Some dll/exe files end up having absolute path names embedded in them
>> despite the use of `--disable-absolute-paths-in-output` build option. This
>> option effectively translates into adding `-pathmap` to compilation lines,
>> but do
On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 11:22:02 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
>> Looks good to me, too. I think it is ready for integration assuming all
>> change requests were taken care of and tests have passed.
>
>> Looks good to me, too. I think it is ready for integration assuming all
>> change requests were take
> Some dll/exe files end up having absolute path names embedded in them despite
> the use of `--disable-absolute-paths-in-output` build option. This option
> effectively translates into adding `-pathmap` to compilation lines, but
> doesn't (always) achieve the desired effects. The reason for tha
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 17:35:37 GMT, Thomas Stuefe wrote:
> I think Tyler has no write access to JBS yet.
This is correct.
> Are all relevant JFR tests part of tier1?
I run the tests in `test/jdk/jdk/jfr` as I develop as well, so those have been
run whether or not they are part of the tier1 tests
On Fri, 4 Feb 2022 18:37:51 GMT, Maxim Kartashev wrote:
>> Some dll/exe files end up having absolute path names embedded in them
>> despite the use of `--disable-absolute-paths-in-output` build option. This
>> option effectively translates into adding `-pathmap` to compilation lines,
>> but do
16 matches
Mail list logo
