On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 09:22:39 GMT, Alan Hayward wrote:
> Doing this caused 7 failures across a full jtreg run, namely:
I'm glad we caught that.
-
PR: https://git.openjdk.java.net/jdk/pull/6334
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 12:25:44 GMT, Andrew Haley wrote:
>> PreserveFramePointer is doing some additional stuff. I'll give it a test to
>> make sure everything still works with PreserveFramePointer fully set. It
>> would make things easier just to force it set with rop protection on.
>
>>
> When printing the native stack trace on Linux (mostly done for hs_err files),
> it only prints the method with its parameters and a relative offset in the
> method:
>
> Stack: [0x7f6e01739000,0x7f6e0183a000], sp=0x7f6e01838110, free
> space=1020k
> Native frames: (J=compiled
> Following the prior discussion [1], here is the PR for the subject
> enhancement. CSR has also been updated according to the suggestion.
>
> [1]
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2022-January/085175.html
Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one
> Following the prior discussion [1], here is the PR for the subject
> enhancement. CSR has also been updated according to the suggestion.
>
> [1]
> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2022-January/085175.html
Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 00:39:04 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Modified per suggestions on the PR
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/time/format/DateTimeFormatterBuilder.java
> line
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022 21:22:12 GMT, Roger Riggs wrote:
>> Naoto Sato has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional
>> commit since the last revision:
>>
>> Modified per suggestions on the PR
>
> src/java.base/share/classes/java/time/format/DateTimeFormatterBuilder.java
> line
On 20:33 Thu 03 Feb , Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-12-22 at 11:14 +0100, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > On Fri, 2021-12-10 at 15:11 +0100, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Please review this adaptation of the corresponding JDK 11 patch. The
> > > JDK 11u patch didn't apply
On Tue, 8 Feb 2022 19:08:45 GMT, Naoto Sato wrote:
>> Following the prior discussion [1], here is the PR for the subject
>> enhancement. CSR has also been updated according to the suggestion.
>>
>> [1]
>> https://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/core-libs-dev/2022-January/085175.html
>
> Naoto
