[jdk18] Integrated: 8280415: Remove EA from JDK 18 version string starting with Initial RC promotion B35 on February 10, 2022

2022-02-15 Thread Pavel Kharskii
On Thu, 10 Feb 2022 18:46:13 GMT, Pavel Kharskii wrote: > …C promotion B35 on February 10, 2022 > > Remove EA from JDK 18 version string starting with Initial RC promotion B35 > on February 10, 2022 This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 0f2113ce Author:Pavel Kharskii Comm

Re: [Ping2?] [8u] RFR: 8210283: Support git as an SCM alternative in the build

2022-02-15 Thread Severin Gehwolf
On Tue, 2022-02-15 at 02:53 +, Andrew Hughes wrote: > On 14:09 Thu 10 Feb , Severin Gehwolf wrote: > > > > Latest webrev: > > https://cr.openjdk.java.net/~sgehwolf/webrevs/JDK-8210283/02/webrev/ > > > > OK? > > > > Thanks, > > Severin > > > > This looks fine. Please flag for approval.

Re: RFR: 8203290: [AIX] Check functionality of JDK-8199712 (Flight Recorder) [v21]

2022-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 23:44:40 GMT, Tyler Steele wrote: >> Just in time for the holidays I have completed an implementation of the JFR >> functionality for AIX. As a side note, this is my first submission to >> OpenJDK 👋 >> >> ### Implementation notes and alternatives considered >> >> After mod

Integrated: 8246033: bin/print_config.js script uses nashorn jjs tool

2022-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 16:23:20 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: > The print_config.js tool was written for Nashorn. With the removal of > Nashorn, this script serves no function and should be removed. This pull request has now been integrated. Changeset: 2112a9dc Author:Magnus Ihse Bursie URL

Re: RFR: 8203290: [AIX] Check functionality of JDK-8199712 (Flight Recorder) [v21]

2022-02-15 Thread Thomas Stuefe
On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 23:44:40 GMT, Tyler Steele wrote: >> Just in time for the holidays I have completed an implementation of the JFR >> functionality for AIX. As a side note, this is my first submission to >> OpenJDK 👋 >> >> ### Implementation notes and alternatives considered >> >> After mod

Re: RFR: 8253757: Add LLVM-based backend for hsdis [v2]

2022-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
> This patch expands the newly added system for hsdis backends to include LLVM. > > The actual code in hsdis-llvm.cpp is based heavily on the work by @luhenry, > as published in the never integrated PR > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/392. (I have basically just ripped out > the binutils-b

Re: RFR: 8253757: Add LLVM-based backend for hsdis [v3]

2022-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
> This patch expands the newly added system for hsdis backends to include LLVM. > > The actual code in hsdis-llvm.cpp is based heavily on the work by @luhenry, > as published in the never integrated PR > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/392. (I have basically just ripped out > the binutils-b

Re: RFR: 8253757: Add LLVM-based backend for hsdis [v4]

2022-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
> This patch expands the newly added system for hsdis backends to include LLVM. > > The actual code in hsdis-llvm.cpp is based heavily on the work by @luhenry, > as published in the never integrated PR > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/392. (I have basically just ripped out > the binutils-b

Re: RFR: 8253757: Add LLVM-based backend for hsdis [v5]

2022-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
> This patch expands the newly added system for hsdis backends to include LLVM. > > The actual code in hsdis-llvm.cpp is based heavily on the work by @luhenry, > as published in the never integrated PR > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/392. (I have basically just ripped out > the binutils-b

Re: RFR: 8253757: Add LLVM-based backend for hsdis [v6]

2022-02-15 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie
> This patch expands the newly added system for hsdis backends to include LLVM. > > The actual code in hsdis-llvm.cpp is based heavily on the work by @luhenry, > as published in the never integrated PR > https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pull/392. (I have basically just ripped out > the binutils-b

Re: RFR: JDK-8281003 - MethodHandles::lookup throws NPE if caller is null [v4]

2022-02-15 Thread Mandy Chung
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 00:10:44 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote: >> JDK-8281003 - MethodHandles::lookup throws NPE if caller is null > > Tim Prinzing has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > remove excess description Looks good. -

Re: RFR: JDK-8281000 ClassLoader::registerAsParallelCapable throws NPE if caller is null [v2]

2022-02-15 Thread Tim Prinzing
> JDK-8281000 ClassLoader::registerAsParallelCapable throws NPE if caller is > null Tim Prinzing has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit since the last revision: Changes from feedback. - Copyright dates fixed - IllegalCallerException thrown for no caller f

Re: RFR: JDK-8281000 ClassLoader::registerAsParallelCapable throws NPE if caller is null [v2]

2022-02-15 Thread Mandy Chung
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 22:17:53 GMT, Tim Prinzing wrote: >> JDK-8281000 ClassLoader::registerAsParallelCapable throws NPE if caller is >> null > > Tim Prinzing has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional > commit since the last revision: > > Changes from feedback. > > -

Re: RFR: JDK-8281000 ClassLoader::registerAsParallelCapable throws NPE if caller is null [v2]

2022-02-15 Thread Mandy Chung
On Tue, 15 Feb 2022 23:05:30 GMT, Mandy Chung wrote: >> Tim Prinzing has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional >> commit since the last revision: >> >> Changes from feedback. >> >> - Copyright dates fixed >> - IllegalCallerException thrown for no caller frame, and