On Sun, 22 May 2022 03:15:20 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> Like the others, it is caused by `Array::at_put()`.
>>
>>
>> In file included from
>> /home/ysuenaga/github-forked/jdk/src/hotspot/share/oops/annotations.hpp:28,
>> from
>> /home/ysuenaga/github-forked/jdk/src/hotspot/sh
> I saw some compiler warnings when I tried to build OpenJDK with GCC 12.0.1 on
> Fedora 36.
> As you can see, the warnings spreads several areas. Let me know if I should
> separate them by area.
>
> * -Wstringop-overflow
> * src/hotspot/share/oops/array.hpp
> *
> src/hotspot/share/jfr/
On Sun, 22 May 2022 05:00:21 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
>> I guess GCC cannot understand `assert(dest != NULL` immediately preceding it.
>>
>>
>> In file included from
>> /home/ysuenaga/github-forked/jdk/src/hotspot/share/jfr/recorder/checkpoint/types/traceid/jfrTraceIdLoadBarrier.inline.hpp:33,
On Sun, 22 May 2022 08:35:54 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>> `Array::_data` is a pseudo flexible array member. "Pseudo" because C++
>> doesn't have flexible array members. The compiler is completely justified in
>> complaining about the apparently out-of-bounds accesses.
>>
>> There is a "well-k
On Sun, 22 May 2022 08:45:48 GMT, Yasumasa Suenaga wrote:
>> I don't think this warning has anything to do with that NULL check. But I'm
>> still not understanding what it is warning about. The "region of size 0" part
>> of the warning message seems important, but I'm not (yet?) seeing how it
>>
Why is it that the vast majority of PRs are recording spurious looking
failures of github pre-submit tests ?
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pulls?q=type%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Arfr
There seems to be so much noise in these that I pay no attention to them
any more (except for jcheck)
but they see
On 23/05/2022 8:22 am, Philip Race wrote:
Why is it that the vast majority of PRs are recording spurious looking
failures of github pre-submit tests ?
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/pulls?q=type%3Apr+is%3Aopen+label%3Arfr
There seems to be so much noise in these that I pay no attention to them
Yet right "at the top" of the list is Linux 86 ... do we have no way to
put it on some 2ndary list ?
-phil.
On 5/22/22 3:58 PM, David Holmes wrote:
On 23/05/2022 8:22 am, Philip Race wrote:
Why is it that the vast majority of PRs are recording spurious
looking failures of github pre-submit t
On Sun, 15 May 2022 20:50:25 GMT, Kim Barrett wrote:
> Please review this cleanup of deprecation warning suppression when building
> for Windows.
>
> This change consists of several parts.
>
> (1) Remove the global deprecation warning suppression when building HotSpot
> for Windows.
>
> (2) Ad
