Re: RFR [XS]: 8248429: Add --enable-preview as VM argument when running microbenchmarks

2020-06-26 Thread Claes Redestad
Patch looks fine (although you might want to update the comment). It's more concerning that I didn't catch this (seems all tests of mine were with --enable-preview), and we'll still inconvenience users who need to run the jar file directly. So it seems we should consider fixing so that only

Re: RFR [XS]: 8248429: Add --enable-preview as VM argument when running microbenchmarks

2020-06-26 Thread Jorn Vernee
Forgot to attach the JBS link: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248429 Jorn On 27/06/2020 00:14, Jorn Vernee wrote: Hi, https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248135 added --enable-preview to the javac options when building micro benchmarks. We should also add it to the set of

RFR [XS]: 8248429: Add --enable-preview as VM argument when running microbenchmarks

2020-06-26 Thread Jorn Vernee
Hi, https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248135 added --enable-preview to the javac options when building micro benchmarks. We should also add it to the set of default VM arguments passed to the microbenchmark jar so it doesn't need to be passed manually. If --enable-preview is not

Re: JDK-8244763: Update --release 8 symbol information after JSR 337 MR3

2020-06-26 Thread Jan Lahoda
Hi, I propose to split the data update (for JDK 15 and for backports) and the tool/CreateSymbols update (for JDK 16+). So I've created: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248405 for the latter. Lets keep JDK-8244763 only for the former, i.e. for this patch:

RE: RFR [XS]: 8248334: hs build errors on ppc64 and s390x platforms

2020-06-26 Thread Baesken, Matthias
HI David and Martin, thanks for the reviews ! > >Hi Matthias, > >Looks good. Thanks for fixing it. > >Best regards, >Martin >> >> Hi Matthias, >> >> That all seems fine to me. >> >> David >>

Re: RFR [XS]: 8248334: hs build errors on ppc64 and s390x platforms

2020-06-26 Thread Doerr, Martin
Hi Matthias, Looks good. Thanks for fixing it. Best regards, Martin > Am 26.06.2020 um 09:59 schrieb David Holmes : > > Hi Matthias, > > That all seems fine to me. > > David > >> On 26/06/2020 5:06 pm, Baesken, Matthias wrote: >> Hello, please review this small patch that fixes the

Re: RFR [XS]: 8248334: hs build errors on ppc64 and s390x platforms

2020-06-26 Thread Lindenmaier, Goetz
Hi, I didn't get the RFR mails. Probably the known hotspot-dev Mailing List Problem? But I saw the RFR in the pipermail archive. I had a look at the change. It looks good, and I consider it trivial. Best regards, Goetz.

Re: RFR [XS]: 8248334: hs build errors on ppc64 and s390x platforms

2020-06-26 Thread David Holmes
Hi Matthias, That all seems fine to me. David On 26/06/2020 5:06 pm, Baesken, Matthias wrote: Hello, please review this small patch that fixes the ppc64(le) and s390x builds . ( They started to break since the 24th June, looks like some inclusions were missing after recent HS

RFR [XS]: 8248334: hs build errors on ppc64 and s390x platforms

2020-06-26 Thread Baesken, Matthias
Hello, please review this small patch that fixes the ppc64(le) and s390x builds . ( They started to break since the 24th June, looks like some inclusions were missing after recent HS changes ) Bug/webrev : https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8248334