Dear All,
I am testing cross compile OpenJDK-9+158 for our embedded system using
buildroot, I can build server and client variants successfully, but the
output compact1 profile file size is too big, then I tried to build minimal
variant, failed when linking libjvm.so.
I checked build/linux-arm-no
public:
}
VMOp_Type type() const { return VMOp_GetFrameLocation; }
jvmtiError result(){ return _result; }
- void doit() {
-_result = JVMTI_ERROR_THREAD_NOT_ALIVE;
-if (Threads::includes(_java_thread) && !_java_thread->is_exiting() &&
-_java_thread->threadObj() != NULL) {
- _result = ((JvmtiEnvB
t; On Feb 28, 2017, at 5:11 AM, David Holmes
> wrote:
> >
> > On 28/02/2017 7:35 PM, David Holmes wrote:
> >> On 28/02/2017 6:51 PM, Zhu Yong wrote:
> >>> Dear All,
> >>>
> >>> I am testing cross compile OpenJDK-9+158 for our embedded
/whetjava2.html, server VM finished
with good result, client and minimal VM not able to finish (program stuck
there forever after print 1st line of output).
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 1:56 PM, David Holmes
wrote:
> On 1/03/2017 3:39 PM, Zhu Yong wrote:
>
>> Thank you for the information,
> On 1/03/2017 4:26 PM, Zhu Yong wrote:
>
>> We use armv7-marvell-linux-gnueabi-softfp toolchain
>>
>> gcc version 4.6.4 (Marvell GCC release 20150204-c4af733b 64K MAXPAGESIZE
>> ALIGN CVE-2015-0235)
>>
>> Is this toolchain too old? I am asking because I
System.exit(5); // I always get exit code 5
}
//System.out.printf("time float value %f\n", q);
return q / 1000.0;
}
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 5:31 PM, David Holmes
wrote:
> On 1/03/2017 6:45 PM, Zhu Yong wrote:
>
>> OK, for the
