On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 20:52:59 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Severin Gehwolf has updated the pull request incrementally with three
>> additional commits since the last revision:
>>
>> - Use shorter name for the build tool
>> - Review feedback from Erik J.
>> - Remove dependency on CDS which
On Wed, 22 May 2024 07:42:39 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> src/jdk.jlink/share/classes/jdk/tools/jlink/resources/jlink.properties line
>> 165:
>>
>>> 163:
>>> 164: runtime.link.info=Linking based on the current run-time image.
>>> 165: runtime.link.jprt.path.extra=(run-time image)
>>
>> M
On Wed, 22 May 2024 07:44:08 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> ... still missing...
>
> Actually, this is a bit strange. I thought jcheck would look for missing
> newline at EOF, and that properties files were included in the check
> nowadays. I'll need to check this out.
I did some testing an
On Tue, 21 May 2024 20:28:37 GMT, Joe Wang wrote:
>> Add two sample configuration files:
>>
>> jaxp-strict.properties: used to set strict configuration, stricter than
>> jaxp.properties in previous versions such as JDK 22
>>
>>> jaxp-compat.properties: used to regain compatibility from any
On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:38:25 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR implements [JEP 472](https://openjdk.org/jeps/472), by restricting
>> the use of JNI in the following ways:
>>
>> * `System::load` and `System::loadLibrary` are now restricted methods
>> * `Runtime::load` and `Runtime::loa
On Wed, 22 May 2024 08:07:59 GMT, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
>> Actually, this is a bit strange. I thought jcheck would look for missing
>> newline at EOF, and that properties files were included in the check
>> nowadays. I'll need to check this out.
>
> I did some testing and it turns out that
> Please review this patch which adds a jlink mode to the JDK which doesn't
> need the packaged modules being present. A.k.a run-time image based jlink.
> Fundamentally this patch adds an option to use `jlink` even though your JDK
> install might not come with the packaged modules (directory `jm
On Wed, 22 May 2024 12:25:09 GMT, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
>> I did some testing and it turns out that this is indeed not checked. I
>> believe this is a miss in the Skara reimplementation of jcheck. I've opened
>> https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/SKARA-2265 to track this.
>>
>> Nevertheless, it
On Tue, 21 May 2024 17:41:46 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
>> Performance. Before:
>>
>> Benchmark(algorithm) (dataSize) (keyLength)
>> (provider) Mode Cnt ScoreError Units
>> SignatureBench.ECDSA.signSHA256withECDSA1024 256
On Tue, 21 May 2024 17:41:46 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
>> Performance. Before:
>>
>> Benchmark(algorithm) (dataSize) (keyLength)
>> (provider) Mode Cnt ScoreError Units
>> SignatureBench.ECDSA.signSHA256withECDSA1024 256
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 15:42:05 GMT, Volodymyr Paprotski wrote:
> Performance. Before:
>
> Benchmark(algorithm) (dataSize) (keyLength)
> (provider) Mode Cnt ScoreError Units
> SignatureBench.ECDSA.signSHA256withECDSA1024 256
>
On Fri, 10 May 2024 23:54:11 GMT, Alex Menkov wrote:
> The change fixes `make hotspot-ide-project` which fails with
>
> \open\make\ide\visualstudio\hotspot\src\classes\build\tools\projectcreator\FileTreeCreator.java:54:
> warning: [this-escape] possible 'this' escape before subclass is fully
>
On Fri, 17 May 2024 13:38:25 GMT, Maurizio Cimadamore
wrote:
>> This PR implements [JEP 472](https://openjdk.org/jeps/472), by restricting
>> the use of JNI in the following ways:
>>
>> * `System::load` and `System::loadLibrary` are now restricted methods
>> * `Runtime::load` and `Runtime::loa
This PR tries store CONSTANT_FieldRef entries in the resolved state whenever
it's safe to do so.
I.e., when a constant pool entry in class `A` refers to a *non-static* field
`B.F`,
- `B` must be the same class as `A`; or
- `B` is a supertype of `A`; or
- `B` is one of the
[vmClasses](https://g
> ### Overview
>
> This PR archives `CONSTANT_FieldRef` entries in the _resolved_ state when
> it's safe to do so.
>
> I.e., when a `CONSTANT_FieldRef` constant pool entry in class `A` refers to a
> *non-static* field `B.F`,
> - `B` is the same class as `A`; or
> - `B` is a supertype of `A`; o
On Wed, 22 May 2024 21:48:44 GMT, Ioi Lam wrote:
> ### Overview
>
> This PR archives `CONSTANT_FieldRef` entries in the _resolved_ state when
> it's safe to do so.
>
> I.e., when a `CONSTANT_FieldRef` constant pool entry in class `A` refers to a
> *non-static* field `B.F`,
> - `B` is the sam
On Wed, 22 May 2024 21:42:14 GMT, Kevin Rushforth wrote:
> Further, I confirm that if I pass that option to jlink or jpackage when
> creating a custom runtime, there is no warning.
Great! What about jpackage without a custom runtime, wondering if
--java-options can be tested.
-
P
17 matches
Mail list logo