Re: [8u-dev] Request for review and approval for bug 8147807: crash in libkcms.so on linux-sparc

2016-02-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
I forgot to add jdk8u-dev list... On 11.02.2016 17:19, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hello, Could you please review the fix for JDK-8147807 and approve push to 8u-dev? JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147807 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8147807/jdk8/webrev.00/ The issue

[8u-dev] Request for review and approval for bug 8147807: crash in libkcms.so on linux-sparc

2016-02-11 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hello, Could you please review the fix for JDK-8147807 and approve push to 8u-dev? JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147807 Webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8147807/jdk8/webrev.00/ The issue is not relevant to jdk 9. The fix just removes kcms service leaving lcms as

Re: [8u-dev] Request for review and approval for bug 8147807: crash in libkcms.so on linux-sparc

2016-04-04 Thread Alexey Ivanov
. Regards, Sean. On 12/02/2016 08:19, Alexey Ivanov wrote: I forgot to add jdk8u-dev list... On 11.02.2016 17:19, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hello, Could you please review the fix for JDK-8147807 and approve push to 8u-dev? JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8147807 Webrev: http

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [11] RFR for JDK-8202476: ImageLib is broken in 32 bit Windows

2018-05-04 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi Phil, Just to confirm: do you approve the change? Thank you, Alexey On 02/05/2018 19:24, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Phil, Thank you for your review. On 02/05/2018 17:28, Phil Race wrote: So ... the original change that removed the mapfiles broke the 32 bit build because of inconsistency

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [11] RFR for JDK-8202476: ImageLib is broken in 32 bit Windows

2018-05-04 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Thank you! -- Alexey On 04/05/2018 18:53, Phil Race wrote: Yes, your confirmation on the testing was all that was needed. -phil. On 5/4/2018 10:45 AM, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Phil, Just to confirm: do you approve the change? Thank you, Alexey On 02/05/2018 19:24, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi

Re: [11] RFR for JDK-8202544: Hide unused exports in libzip

2018-05-09 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Any volunteers from core-libs and/or hotspot? Thank you, Alexey On 02/05/2018 13:02, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: Looks good to me, FWIW. /Magnus 2 maj 2018 kl. 13:52 skrev Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com>: Hi, Could you please review the following fix for jdk11? bug:

Re: [11] RFR for JDK-8202544: Hide unused exports in libzip

2018-05-11 Thread Alexey Ivanov
regards Christoph -Original Message- From: build-dev [mailto:build-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net] On Behalf Of Alexey Ivanov Sent: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2018 16:35 To: core-libs <core-libs-...@openjdk.java.net>; hotspot-dev Cc: build-dev <build-dev@openjdk.java.net> Subject:

Re: [8u-dev] RFR for JDK-8203790: MSVCP dependency introduced in awt.dll

2018-05-25 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Thank you Magnus and Kevin for your quick reviews. Regards, Alexey On 25/05/2018 09:49, Kevin Walls wrote: Thanks Alexey - my build with this change completed OK too and the MSVCP dependency in awt.dll has gone, great! Thanks Kevin On 25/05/2018 09:27, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi, Could

[8u-dev] RFR for JDK-8203790: MSVCP dependency introduced in awt.dll

2018-05-25 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi, Could you please review the following fix for 8u-dev? jbs: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8203790 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8203790/jdk8/webrev.0/ There's a missing ‘C‘ in the name, and the compiler flags were not added which led to the dependency. Thank

[8u-dev] RFR for 8179675: Build with error on windows with new Cygwin grep

2018-06-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi, Could you please review the following fix for 8u-dev? JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179675 webrev: cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8179675/jdk8/webrev.0/ The problem is that newer grep v3.0 does not match the end-of-line if the input uses Windows line endings. The fix

Re: [8u-dev] RFR for 8179675: Build with error on windows with new Cygwin grep

2018-06-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Resending with clickable link to the webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8179675/jdk8/webrev.0/ -- Alexey On 12/06/2018 19:06, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi, Could you please review the following fix for 8u-dev? JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179675 webrev: http

[8u-dev] RFA for JDK-8079788: Fix broken CL version detection in configure for some Visual Studio configurations

2018-05-29 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi, Could you please approve the following backport to 8u-dev? JBS: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8079788 jdk9 changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/dev/rev/d57780478145 Code review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2016-August/017566.html The patch applies

Re: [8u-dev] RFA for JDK-8079788: Fix broken CL version detection in configure for some Visual Studio configurations

2018-05-29 Thread Alexey Ivanov
I can fix it before pushing. Regards, Alexey On 29/05/2018 15:13, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks good (except for my spelling error in the comment "siutations". Not sure what the policy is for fixing such in backports.) /Erik On 2018-05-29 05:27, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi, Could

[11] RFR for JDK-8202476: ImageLib is broken in 32 bit Windows

2018-05-02 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi, Could you please review the following fix for jdk11? bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202476 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8202476/jdk11/webrev.0/ This is a follow-up fix for JDK-8201226 which enabled building JDK for 32 bit Windows, its code review:

[11] RFR for JDK-8202544: Hide unused exports in libzip

2018-05-02 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi, Could you please review the following fix for jdk11? bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202544 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8202544/jdk11/webrev.0/ The following exported functions in libzip are not used: ZIP_GetEntry, ZIP_FreeEntry, ZIP_Lock, ZIP_Unlock,

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [11] RFR for JDK-8202476: ImageLib is broken in 32 bit Windows

2018-05-02 Thread Alexey Ivanov
as well. /Magnus 2 maj 2018 kl. 11:52 skrev Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com>: Hi, Could you please review the following fix for jdk11? bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8202476 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8202476/jdk11/webrev.0/ This is a follow-

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-06 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi Magnus, Matthias, I tried to build 32 bit Windows but it fails to run for me with Corrupted ZIP library: c:\work\jdk-dev\build\windows-x86-normal-server-release\jdk\bin\zip.dll The problem is that zip.dll exports all symbols as C++ rather than C. For example, ZIP_CRC32 is exported as

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-09 Thread Alexey Ivanov
and JNICALL from main(). It wasn't exported, and it shouldn't be. Regards, Alexey Best regards , Matthias -Original Message- From: Alexey Ivanov [mailto:alexey.iva...@oracle.com] Sent: Montag, 9. April 2018 15:52 To: Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus.ihse.bur...@oracle.com>; B

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-10 Thread Alexey Ivanov
to Alexey to provide the incorporated patch . You can reference both yourself and me as Contributed-by: mbaesken, aivanov when pushing the changeset if you don't mind. Regards, Alexey Best regards, Matthias -Original Message- From: Alexey Ivanov [mailto:alexey.iva

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-11 Thread Alexey Ivanov
I guess we also need to get an approval from core-libs (cc'd) as libzip and libjimage are modified. Regards, Alexey On 11/04/2018 10:56, Alexey Ivanov wrote: The change looks good to me. On 11/04/2018 10:20, Baesken, Matthias wrote: Was main() exported via map files? Seems main

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-11 Thread Alexey Ivanov
You can reference both yourself and me as Contributed-by: mbaesken, aivanov when pushing the changeset if you don't mind. Sure . Best regards, Matthias -Original Message----- From: Alexey Ivanov [mailto:alexey.iva...@oracle.com] Sent: Dienstag, 10. April 2018 21:34 To: Baesken

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-11 Thread Alexey Ivanov
it. Then JNIEXPORT is better left untouched to keep main() exported. Regards, Alexey Best regards, Matthias -Original Message- From: Alexey Ivanov [mailto:alexey.iva...@oracle.com] Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2018 11:11 To: Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>; Magnus Ihse

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-11 Thread Alexey Ivanov
On 11/04/2018 11:38, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: 11 apr. 2018 kl. 11:10 skrev Alexey Ivanov <alexey.iva...@oracle.com>: On 11/04/2018 08:44, Baesken, Matthias wrote: JIMAGE_FindResource doesn't have JNICALL modifier now, does it? Hi Alexey, yes that's true . Please remove JNIEXPOR

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
, I've just submitted a build job with your changeset and am running 32 bit Windows build. Regards, Alexey [1] http://openjdk.java.net/census#mbaesken Best regards , Matthias -Original Message- From: Baesken, Matthias Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2018 11:20 To: 'Alexey Ivanov

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi Matthias, On 12/04/2018 11:12, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Matthias, On 12/04/2018 08:49, Baesken, Matthias wrote: Hi,  could  someone please  sponsor  the change  now ? According to OpenJDK Census page [1], you have committer rights to JDK project. And  could someone please check  what

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
,  but  no  response   so far . Maybe  the submit repo  is not working currently  ,  not sure about it . Best regards , Matthias -Original Message- From: Baesken, Matthias Sent: Mittwoch, 11. April 2018 11:20 To: 'Alexey Ivanov' <alexey.iva...@oracle.com>; Magnus Ihse Bursie <magnus

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi  Alan , this is the up to date webrev . However we want to add   Alexey   Ivanov  as additional  author . As I read it, this changes the calling convention of these functions on 32-bit Windows but it will have no impact on 64-bit Windows (as __stdcall is ignored) or other platforms, is that cor

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-09 Thread Alexey Ivanov
-ldl $(LIBCXX), \ LIBS_macosx := -lc++, \ LIBS_windows := jvm.lib, \ I wonder why the 64bit windows build can live without the exports , any ideas ? Best regards , Matthias -Original Message- From: Alexey Ivanov [mailto:alexey.iva...@oracle.com] Sent: Samstag, 7. April 2018 00:14

[8u-dev] RFA for JDK-8179079: Incremental HotSpot builds broken on Windows

2018-04-18 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi, Could you please approve this backport to 8u? Regards, Alexey On 18/04/2018 16:27, Erik Joelsson wrote: Looks good. Thanks for taking care of this backport! /Erik On 2018-04-18 05:06, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi, Could you please review the following backport of the build fix

Re: [8u-dev] RFA for JDK-8179079: Incremental HotSpot builds broken on Windows

2018-04-18 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Sorry for duplicate request. Kevin proposes the same changeset, I'll let Kevin proceed as he has many other build tweaks. -- Regards, Alexey On 18/04/2018 18:13, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi, Could you please approve this backport to 8u? Regards, Alexey On 18/04/2018 16:27, Erik Joelsson

[8u-dev] RFR for JDK-8179079: Incremental HotSpot builds broken on Windows

2018-04-18 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi, Could you please review the following backport of the build fix for Windows: jbs: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8179079 review: http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2017-April/019045.html changeset: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk10/jdk10/rev/6426c94ee05f The patch

Re: [11] RFR for JDK-8199627: Use "Per-Monitor V2" High DPI awareness for Windows 10 v1703

2018-04-16 Thread Alexey Ivanov
ggestion on how to address this issue? /Magnus On 2018-04-06 00:39, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hello, Could you please review the fix for jdk11? bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8199627 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8199627/webrev.0/ Windows 10 v1703 provides improved High DPI mo

Re: 8201226 missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations - was : RE: missing JNIEXPORT / JNICALL at some places in function declarations/implementations

2018-04-16 Thread Alexey Ivanov
, Matthias -Original Message- From: Alexey Ivanov [mailto:alexey.iva...@oracle.com] Sent: Donnerstag, 12. April 2018 23:53 To: Phil Race <philip.r...@oracle.com>; Baesken, Matthias <matthias.baes...@sap.com>; Alan Bateman <alan.bate...@oracle.com>; Magnus Ihse Bursi

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-11-15 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi Ali, Can the issue be resolved by using different call modifiers on the affected functions? Some build / link issues were resolved by adding / removing JNICALL modifier, see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201226

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-12-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
On 12/12/2018 16:52, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2018-12-12 16:34, Alexey Ivanov wrote: On 12/12/2018 12:58, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2018-12-12 12:35, Alan Bateman wrote: On 12/12/2018 11:14, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: : I searched the code for "jdwpTransport_On&qu

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-12-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
On 12/12/2018 12:58, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2018-12-12 12:35, Alan Bateman wrote: On 12/12/2018 11:14, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: : I searched the code for "jdwpTransport_On" to see of there was any corresponding OnUnload function (or other), but could not find any. That's right,

[12] RFR for JDK-8214122: JDWP is broken on 32 bit Windows: transport library missing onLoad entry (was: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration)

2018-12-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/build/reference/decorated-names?view=vs-2017#FormatC [2] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-ie/cpp/cpp/stdcall?view=vs-2017 On 12/12/2018 11:19, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2018-12-11 18:16, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Simon, Thank you for your comments. The updated

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-12-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
d"} #define AGENT_ONATTACH_SYMBOLS {"_Agent_OnAttach@12", “Agent_OnAttach”} Bob. On Dec 11, 2018, at 11:43 AM, Simon Tooke wrote: On 2018-12-11 10:05 a.m., Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi everyone, I came up with the following patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8214122/web

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-12-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi Simon, I'd like to clarify some points… Please see my comments inline: On 11/12/2018 17:16, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Simon, Thank you for your comments. The updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8214122/webrev.01/ Indeed, it looks much cleaner. Regards, Alexey On 11/12

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-12-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Forgot to add the link: On 12/12/2018 16:10, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Ali has scanned the code base, he says, “couldn’t find (hopefully tbh) other occurrences of such mismatches.” http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2018-December/024358.html On 10/12/2018 10:45, Magnus Ihse Bursie

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-12-11 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi everyone, I came up with the following patch: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8214122/webrev.00/ It specifically addresses the problem in JDK-8214122 where on 32 bit Windows jdwpTransport_OnLoad can exported with its plain and __stdcall-mangled name. I used conditional compilation so

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-12-11 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi Simon, Thank you for your comments. The updated webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8214122/webrev.01/ Indeed, it looks much cleaner. Regards, Alexey On 11/12/2018 16:43, Simon Tooke wrote: On 2018-12-11 10:05 a.m., Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi everyone, I came up with the following

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-12-07 Thread Alexey Ivanov
, at 12:12, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Ali, The fix looks good to me provided it resolves your problem. I am not a reviewer so you'll have to get OK from reviewers, likely from build-dev and from core-libs. Have you submitted the issue in JBS? You have to sign OCA to be able to contribute

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-12-07 Thread Alexey Ivanov
nion from serviceability-dev if there is any problem with changing the signature. I'd preferably have that. If no one knows, I'd say, change it, and see if we still pass the relevant tests, and if so, ship it. /Magnus 22 nov. 2018 kl. 18:04 skrev Alexey Ivanov <mailto:alexey.iva...@oracle.com>

[12] RFR for JDK-8215123: Crash in runtime image built with jlink --compress=2

2018-12-10 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi, Could you please review the following fix for jdk12? bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8215123 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8215123/webrev.00/ The problem is that calling convention was changed on ZIP_InflateFully function in zip.dll. Yet it hasn't been updated

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-12-10 Thread Alexey Ivanov
e size of function parameters. Could it be the reason why most DLLs export __stdcall functions undecorated? Regards, Alexey /Magnus -Simon Tooke On 12/7/2018 2:09 PM, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Andrew, Sorry for my belated reply. Yes, it's also an option… however, this solution seems to be

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-11-22 Thread Alexey Ivanov
On 21/11/2018 12:16, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2018-11-20 16:49, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Ali, Magnus, I absolutely agree this change has to be reviewed by someone from serviceability. There are several options: 1. Add -export:jdwpTransport_OnLoad to LDFLAGS for Windows http

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-11-19 Thread Alexey Ivanov
, jdwpTransportCallback* cbTablePtr, jint version, jdwpTransportEnv** env) { On 16 Nov 2018, at 23:03, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Ali, It's exactly what I referred to. Yes, it does change the calling convention. Yet it's not a (big) problem because both parties will use

Re: [PATCH] Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-11-16 Thread Alexey Ivanov
? Regards, Ali On 15 Nov 2018, at 22:14, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Ali, Can the issue be resolved by using different call modifiers on the affected functions? Some build / link issues were resolved by adding / removing JNICALL modifier, see https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201226 http

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-11-20 Thread Alexey Ivanov
an issue? Regards, Ali On 19 Nov 2018, at 12:12, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Ali, The fix looks good to me provided it resolves your problem. I am not a reviewer so you'll have to get OK from reviewers, likely from build-dev and from core-libs. Have you submitted the issue in JBS? You have

Re: [PATCH] JDK-8214122 Prevent name mangling of jdwpTransport_OnLoad in Windows 32-bit DLL name decoration

2018-11-20 Thread Alexey Ivanov
JavaVM *vm, jdwpTransportCallback* cbTablePtr, jint version, jdwpTransportEnv** env) { On 16 Nov 2018, at 23:03, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Ali, It's exactly what I referred to. Yes, it does change the calling convention. Yet it's not a (big) problem because both parties will us

Re: [12] RFR for JDK-8214122: JDWP is broken on 32 bit Windows: transport library missing onLoad entry

2018-12-19 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Any volunteers from core-libs and serviceability to review? Regards, Alexey On 12/12/2018 16:43, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: On 2018-12-12 17:38, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi all, I have updated the summary of JDK-8214122 and the subject accordingly. Could you please review the following fix

Re: [12] RFR for JDK-8214122: JDWP is broken on 32 bit Windows: transport library missing onLoad entry

2018-12-19 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Thank you, Daniel, for your quick review. On 19/12/2018 15:05, Daniel D. Daugherty wrote: On 12/19/18 9:23 AM, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Any volunteers from core-libs and serviceability to review? How about former Serviceability Team members? :-) Alan B. and I both used

[13] RFR: JDK-8217707: JNICALL declaration breaks Splash screen functions

2019-03-24 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi, Please review the fix for jdk 13. bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217707 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8217707/webrev.0/ Description: Splash screen functionality is broken in 32 bit Windows. It's because the functions in splashscreen.dll are exported with

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [13] RFR: JDK-8217707: JNICALL declaration breaks Splash screen functions

2019-03-28 Thread Alexey Ivanov
On 28/03/2019 17:15, Philip Race wrote: > I've run SplashScreen jtreg tests, all tests pass. I assume you mean you did this for 32 AND 64 bit builds ? Yes, I ran the tests for both 32 and 64 bit builds. -- Alexey If so, then +1 -phil. On 3/28/19, 9:11 AM, Alexey Ivanov wrote:

Re: [OpenJDK 2D-Dev] [13] RFR: JDK-8217707: JNICALL declaration breaks Splash screen functions

2019-03-28 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Any volunteers for review? On 24/03/2019 19:18, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi, Please review the fix for jdk 13. bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8217707 webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~aivanov/8217707/webrev.0/ Description: Splash screen functionality is broken in 32 bit Windows

Re: compiling openJdk 11 on windows 7 32bits fail

2019-02-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
On 12/02/2019 04:25, David Holmes wrote: On 12/02/2019 1:45 pm, Franco Gastón Pellegrini wrote: I just downloaded again (to be sure about my errors) JDK 12 and use this command: bash ./configure --enable-debug --disable-warnings-as-errors --with-target-bits=32 --with-toolchain-version=2017

Re: compiling openJdk 11 on windows 7 32bits fail

2019-02-12 Thread Alexey Ivanov
On 12/02/2019 14:37, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote: There has been some fallout due to the mapfile/linking changes made in JDK 12 that affected JNICALL. However, that should not be affecting JDK 11. Wasn't it done in JDK 11? If my memory serves me right, it was done in JDK 11. -- Alexey

Re: compiling openJdk 11 on windows 7 32bits fail

2019-02-11 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi Franco, On 11/02/2019 02:03, David Holmes wrote: On 8/02/2019 5:07 am, Franco Gastón Pellegrini wrote: I tried compiling JDK 12 for 32 bits, and I get similar errors: === Output from failing command(s) repeated here === * For target hotspot_variant-client_libjvm_objs_classFileParser.obj:

Re: compiling openJdk 11 on windows 7 32bits fail

2019-02-11 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi David, On 11/02/2019 11:33, David Holmes wrote: Hi Alexey, On 11/02/2019 7:12 pm, Alexey Ivanov wrote: Hi Franco, On 11/02/2019 02:03, David Holmes wrote: On 8/02/2019 5:07 am, Franco Gastón Pellegrini wrote: I tried compiling JDK 12 for 32 bits, and I get similar errors: === Output

Re: RFR 8232880: Update test documentation with additional settings for client UI tooltip tests

2019-10-31 Thread Alexey Ivanov
019 10:56, Dmitry Markov wrote: Hi Alexey, I have updated the fix based on your recommendation. The new version is located at: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8232880/webrev.02/ Also please find my answers inline. Thanks, Dmitry On 29 Oct 2019, at 19:29, Alexey Ivanov <mailto:alexey.iva..

Re: RFR 8232880: Update test documentation with additional settings for client UI tooltip tests

2019-10-29 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi Dmitry, Shall we drop hyphen in the header: “Client UI Tests”? I think there should be no definite article in this sentence: “use -the- key sequences”. “…Turn off Windowss key hotkeys…”, there's an extra ‘s’ in Windows. ”Note: restart is required to make the settings take effect.” Just

Re: RFR 8232880: Update test documentation with additional settings for client UI tooltip tests

2019-10-25 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Got it! Then I'd just drop the quotes from the key names: - `“CTRL” + “F1”` + `Ctrl + F1` On 25/10/2019 16:52, Erik Joelsson wrote: The HTML is generated from the markup and should not be edited by hand. /Erik -- Regards, Alexey

Re: RFR 8232880: Update test documentation with additional settings for client UI tooltip tests

2019-10-25 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Hi Dmitry, Apple uses macOS to refer to its operating system, so should we also use it instead of former OS X? For HTML version, I would suggest using the following markup Ctrl +F1 for the keyboard shortcut. [1] I think using elements for instructions on how to disable the shortcut is

Re: RFR 8232880: Update test documentation with additional settings for client UI tooltip tests

2019-11-01 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Thank you, Dmitry! The changes look good to me. On 01/11/2019 13:09, Dmitry Markov wrote: Hi Alexey, I have updated the fix. Please find the new version here: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~dmarkov/8232880/webrev.03/ Thanks, Dmitry On 31 Oct 2019, at 16:27, Alexey Ivanov <mailto:alexey.

RFR: 8284209: Replace remaining usages of 'a the' in source code

2022-05-18 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations: a/the, an?/an?, the/the… It's the last issue in the series, and it still touches different areas of the code. - Commit messages: - 8284209: Replace remaining usages of 'the a' in source code - 8284209:

Re: RFR: 8284209: Replace remaining usages of 'a the' in source code [v2]

2022-05-23 Thread Alexey Ivanov
> Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations: > a/the, an?/an?, the/the… > > It's the last issue in the series, and it still touches different areas of > the code. Alexey Ivanov has updated the pull request with a new target base due to a me

Integrated: 8284209: Replace remaining usages of 'a the' in source code

2022-05-24 Thread Alexey Ivanov
On Wed, 18 May 2022 14:46:42 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: > Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations: > a/the, an?/an?, the/the… > > It's the last issue in the series, and it still touches different areas of > the code. This pull request has now

Re: RFR: 8284209: Replace remaining usages of 'a the' in source code [v3]

2022-05-24 Thread Alexey Ivanov
> Replaces usages of articles that follow each other in all combinations: > a/the, an?/an?, the/the… > > It's the last issue in the series, and it still touches different areas of > the code. Alexey Ivanov has updated the pull request incrementally with one additional commit

RFR: 8288114: Update JIRA link in vcs.xml

2022-06-10 Thread Alexey Ivanov
Update the link to JBS in `vcs.xml` template to https://bugs.openjdk.org/ It will affect newly generated project files only. Edit `vcs.xml` manually or in UI to update in existing projects. - Commit messages: - 8288114: Update JIRA link in vcs.xml Changes:

Re: RFR: 8288114: Update JIRA link in vcs.xml

2022-06-13 Thread Alexey Ivanov
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 17:11:41 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: > Update the link to JBS in `vcs.xml` template to https://bugs.openjdk.org/ > > It will affect newly generated project files only. > Edit `vcs.xml` manually or in UI to update in existing projects. Bot, wake up!

Integrated: 8288114: Update JIRA link in vcs.xml

2022-06-13 Thread Alexey Ivanov
On Fri, 10 Jun 2022 17:11:41 GMT, Alexey Ivanov wrote: > Update the link to JBS in `vcs.xml` template to https://bugs.openjdk.org/ > > It will affect newly generated project files only. > Edit `vcs.xml` manually or in UI to update in existing projects. This pull request