On 5/16/11 11:04 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> Different distros enable different sets of warnings by default.
Any idea why, for example Fedora's & Debian's, default warning sets differ?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java
On 5/16/11 12:48 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 16/05/11 11:22, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> Any idea why, for example Fedora's & Debian's, default warning sets differ?
>
> Because the distros patch their versions of gcc.
I don't see how the implication follows just
otstrap option on Fedora 9, then it'd be fine to
include
it as an alternative in the Fedora 9 tabs, in my opinion.
Andrew, do you happen to know which version of OpenJDK 6 was packaged in Fedora
9
via IcedTea?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibo
de "afxres.h"
./jdk/src/windows/resource/version.rc:#include "afxres.h"
No for JDK 7 Updates:
dalibor-topics-macbook:jdk7u robilad$ grep -r "afxres.h" .
dalibor-topics-macbook:jdk7u robilad$
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor T
; What is the right behaviour here from posters side?
Subscribe to a list in order to post to it.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V.
ut I'm
not aware of any central repository of such results.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 |
make this number > RAM, the Linux/Solaris systems could very
> easily just page thrash.
>
> We could declare that 2GB RAM is the minimum now, on all systems, and do as
> you say, but
> there are people out there with less RAM, I think... not me...
A 2G minimum sound
Once this is pushed into jdk8, please consider backporting it to jdk7u -
I'm seeing the same issue with jdk7u-dev on Ubuntu 11.10.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 11/10/11 11:25 AM, Alex Menkov wrote:
> Looks good
>
> regards
> Alex
>
> On 10.11.2011 09:24, mark.reinh...@or
er platforms it must be set explicitly.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg
OR
combination that the Icedtea developers at
distro-pkg-dev@openjdk are more familiar
with. Please ask build questions about it on that mailing list.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
achine.
Not to mention the care and feeding of build bots running Windows, where
running autoreconf just-in-time before starting the build process could be
a lengthy text adventure ... ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Ph
e a la
"After installing XCode, you must install the XCode command line tools. They
are available for download through XCode itself."
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
Oracl
Changeset: 2f06b15e2439
Author:ewendeli
Date: 2012-05-03 14:17 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8/build/rev/2f06b15e2439
7154130: Add Mac OS X Instructions to README-builds.html
Reviewed-by: ohair
Contributed-by: edvard.wende...@oracle.com
! README-builds.html
#x27;s using the wrong java runtime to run test_gamma to begin
with, right?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Na
On 8/8/12 2:10 PM, Andrew Hughes wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On 8/08/2012 8:54 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>> $ export
>>> ALT_BOOTDIR=/Library/Java/JavaVirtualMachines/1.7.0.jdk/Contents/Home
>>> $ time make | tee 7u6b23build.log
>>> [snip]
had it installed from
MacPorts and working before.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097
elease/jdk/gensrc/sun/awt/X11/XAWTIcon32_java_icon16_png.java]
Error 1
gmake[1]: *** [gensrc-only] Error 2
cheers,
dalibor topic
ols (java source
> generation for X11) running on the boot jdk.
Anything I can dig into to help track this one down?
cheers,
dalibor topic
> /Erik
>
> On 2013-01-25 10:14, dalibor.to...@oracle.com wrote:
>> I checked out jdk8/jdk8 and gave it a go using the new build system. It
27; situation, so in that
case,
having to re-run configure, and potentially the whole build again seems like a
worse
option then just adding a variable to the make run as you need it (or not).
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product M
On 4/11/13 1:52 AM, David Katleman wrote:
> Thank you Tim!
>
> Any other comments before I commit?
Nothing from me - You'll need to send a request for approval to jdk7u-dev
before the push,
though.
cheers,
dalibor topic
>
> Thanks
> Dave
>
> On 4/10
cond review from there, and Alejandro as a
heads up that this change touches Hotspot makefiles.
cheers,
dalibor topic
> The changes are at :
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~katleman/8014129/hotspot/webrev/
> <http://cr.openjdk.java.net/%7Ekatleman/8014129/hotspot/webrev/>
> htt
go - it's from the lowest rung upwards to the highest (and
back), not sideways across. ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B
On Tue, 1 Jun 2021 20:00:07 GMT, jtfuller111
wrote:
> Fixing the zoom issue on IGV. I tested this on Windows and Linux and zooming
> now works as expected.
Hi, please send an e-mail to dalibor.to...@oracle.com so that I can mark your
account as verified.
-
PR: https://git.openjd
ost of its time executing code it JIT-compiled
itself.
I think more interesting from a developer/CI perspective would be
potential differences in compilation speed, but I would naively assume
those to be dominated by the linker, rather than the compiler itself.
cheers,
dalibor topic
bes
already. It seems such an
obvious idea.
For clang there is https://clang.llvm.org/docs/UsersManual.html#clang-cl
but I have not tried it myself. But then again the linker step might be
problematic.
cheers,
dalibor topic
Cheers, Thomas
On Fri, Mar 11, 2022 at 2:35 PM Julian Waters
wrote:
You're not trying to build jdk8/jdk8 instead of jdk8u/jdk8u, right?
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 23.11.2017 11:50, Ted Neward wrote:
Yeah, I’ve got build-dep and openjdk-8. I’ll have a look at the source, but
this begs a question: Why hasn’t it been backported to the JDK8 repo, if it’s a
Probably - jdk8/jdk8 is the GA source code from a few years ago.
jdk8u/jdk8u is the latest JDK 8 updates.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 23.11.2017 12:12, Ted Neward wrote:
Errr….. What’s the difference, again?
I cloned java.net/jdk8/jdk8, which is what I thought was the correct repo—is
there a
hg clone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk8u/jdk8u/ and then bash
get_source.sh within jdk8u directory.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 23.11.2017 12:15, Ted Neward wrote:
Save me a Google and remind me where that repo URL is? :-)
Ted Neward
Author, Speaker, Mentor
http://www.newardassociates.com
t
since in the updates.
JDK Release Projects like JDK 8 have a special status in Bylaws (see
http://openjdk.java.net/bylaws#jdk-release-projects) while 'regular'
Projects like JDK 8 Updates do not. So updates end up being separate
Projects with separate repos.
Well ... you asked. ;)
chee
16.04 or 17.10, so you may need to play with
g++ flags to not error out on warnings, in case that g++ on the system
is too ... fresh. It should build fine with gcc 6 based systems, too,
while you may need to disable warnings as errors with gcc 7.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 23.11.2017 12:19, Ted
t-get build-dep openjdk-8 (or
9, depending on which one you're trying to create a CI image for) as
part of your docker build.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 24.11.2017 10:42, Ted Neward wrote:
Changing it up just a touch….
I got it to build fine inside of Ubuntu 16 (and, just for kicks, Kubuntu
c would usually be better off in its own Project, as
that allows the Project's contributors to bootstrap a port and the
assiciated roles (Committer, Reviewer, etc) without having to 'earn
merit' as mainline committers first.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com&g
he Mozilla root certificates, for
example. So I don't think that it's necessary for the build support to
remain, once this change goes in.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
O
/msg00177.html for an example
of the accidental complexity that the whole thing triggered.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hambu
ance (long term).
For a non-obvious example, having to support two ways of doing something
because one way was deprecated and removed, but one is stuck with some
old baseline where it still wasn't adds non-trivial cost to design,
decision making, maintenance, etc.
cheers,
dalibor topic
keep it
working in the faster paced mainline jdk/jdk development tree.
That way an additional maintenance burden would be created only where
it's desired and presumably, necessary.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +49
atforms they support, and I presume that Red Hat and SAP and others
do the same, but the OpenJDK project itself does not.
To add to that, the list of platforms supported by the latest JDK 10
OpenJDK binaries can be found at http://jdk.java.net/10/supported .
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
&l
mpiler)
Graal -> Graal JIT (to avoid potential confusion with similarly named
runtime technologies)
jfr enable Java Flight Recorder (JFR)
Java -> JDK
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic
Consulting Product Manager
Phone: +494
Hi Magnus,
I'll put opening the bug and creating a patch on my little pile of
things to do ... eventually, so no worries.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 25.02.2020 16:33, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Hi Dalibor,
I just pushed this. Are your suggestions important enough that I should o
On 09.02.2015 16:37, Omair Majid wrote:
At this point, only showstopper bugs are being accepted into JDK 7u.
Please hold onto this patch until jdk7u80 is released and the repository
is open for fixes again.
Thanks, Omair - that's the best approach.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
it easier for the BSD port to integrate JDK 9 changes sounds fine
to me, but I'm not a JDK 9/build area Reviewer.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/2014-April/002245.html
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phon
On 16.02.2016 15:40, Andrew Haley wrote:
GCC 6 is quite new, so we have a little time before the various users
of OpenJDK start to hit these problems,
What does the general adoption timeline for GCC 6 look for Linux
distributions?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> D
Thanks, Andrew - it sounds like it could affect 8u as well within the
year, then.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 18.02.2016 13:46, Andrew Haley wrote:
On 02/18/2016 12:20 PM, dalibor topic wrote:
On 16.02.2016 15:40, Andrew Haley wrote:
GCC 6 is quite new, so we have a little time before the
On 05.12.2016 12:17, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
So far my knowledge was Oracle didn't build the Zero port
at all.
See http://openjdk.java.net/projects/mobile/
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +4
On 29.03.2017 16:40, Ricardo Almeida wrote:
Hi,
I could not raise a bug in https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/
Hi,
please use bugs.java.com to file issues if you're not an OpenJDK developer.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Ma
as Andrew suggested, use a different forest from the AArch64 Port Project.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/build-dev/2017-April/018974.html
On 20.04.2017 13:16, Martijn Verburg wrote:
Hi all,
We've been putting together a community build farm and have wr
.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 24.04.2017 19:35, Ted Neward wrote:
Can you be more specific as to which features it’s lacking? (Having spent a
fair amount of time on Windows in my career, I might be able to suggest some
ways to work with/around it, though I’ll be the first to admit the
Linux-on-Windows
ed to discuss with that platform's provider through whatever
channels they have for such support.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehö
On 31.05.2017 11:52, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 11:46:45AM +0200, dalibor topic wrote:
If you are running your own OpenJDK builds on a platform not listed on
https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/Build/Supported+Build+Platforms such
as SmartOS you may need to
nsored changes in a Project's repository,
you can become an Author, and can start using the OpenJDK code review,
bug tracking and other infrastructure directly. Please see
http://openjdk.java.net/projects/#project-author for details.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dal
On 21.06.2017 02:46, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Also known as: "!!! THIS IS A MAJOR RE-WRITE of this
document. !" :-)
It is also very good. Thank you. ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phon
lts/9/testresults.html . New
test results for EA builds are announced on quality-discuss mailing list.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5
9 resulted in some build system changes (because of modules), and it
would be up to each port's maintainers to make sure that they keep their
port in sync in tree.
cheers,
dalibor topic
[0]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/bsd-port-dev/2017-August/thread.html
--
<http://w
teers, or, ideally,
both.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com> Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Kühnehöfe 5 | 22761 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwalt
On 7/12/13 8:57 AM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Looks good to me though I'm not a jdk7 reviewer.
Looks good to me, too. Local OpenJDK build on OS X and an OpenJDK linux build
on JPRT both passed.
Please send in a fresh phase 2 approval request to the jdk7u-dev list.
cheers,
dalibor topic
This looks fine for jdk7u-dev.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 8/12/13 5:38 PM, David DeHaven wrote:
>
> Updated:
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ddehaven/8022734/jdk.1/
>
> JPRT run was successful, aside from a spurious solaris_sparc_5.10.product
> "resource unavailable"
On 8/19/13 2:43 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> And again, here we go:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8023216/webrev.root.01/
A few typos:
javascript -> JavaScript
sourses -> sources
cheers,
dalibor topic
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2013-08-19 11:05, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Nice, thanks.
On 8/21/13 2:53 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
> Thanks, updated webrev:
>
> http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~erikj/8023216/webrev.root.02/
>
> /Erik
>
> On 2013-08-19 16:38, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> On 8/19/13 2:43 PM, Erik Joelsson wrote:
>>>
current AC_PREREQ is 2.61, fwiw, which is from 2006. Latest Autoconf is 2.69
from 2012, preceded by 2.68 from 2010.
It may be useful to limit the variety of autoconfs in use by setting AC_PREREQ
to, say, 2.68.
cheers,
dalibor topic
On 8/28/13 10:29 AM, Chris Hegarty wrote:
> Sounds good
On 8/28/13 4:59 PM, Mike Duigou wrote:
>
> On Aug 28 2013, at 07:42 , Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
>> current AC_PREREQ is 2.61, fwiw, which is from 2006. Latest Autoconf is 2.69
>> from 2012, preceded by 2.68 from 2010.
>>
>> It may be useful to limit the varie
t use AC_CONFIG_COMMANDS [0] ?
cheers,
dalibor topic
[06
https://www.gnu.org/savannah-checkouts/gnu/autoconf/manual/autoconf-2.69/html_node/Configuration-Commands.html#Configuration-Commands
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +4940890
On 10/5/13 3:28 PM, Francis ANDRE wrote:
> Thus I am wondering if there is a java or ant version of webrev
Unfortunately, no.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
Oracle Java
well as the new file README-Windows-Cygwin-VS2010
I don't think that it's necessary to include blog posts in the source code
archives. ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile: +491737185961
ge of the
Project - switching build systems is a very invasive, major long term change,
and as such better suited to JDK Release Projects then to update releases.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Principal Product Manager
Phone: +494089091214 | Mobile
g the scripting engine tests conditionally in OpenJDK, see
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.java.openjdk.distro-packaging.devel/1951
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
***
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambas
things a little
tricky.
Landon suggested a while ago exploring https://scripting.dev.java.net/ ,
which includes a Rhino
binding.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F
Erik Trimble wrote:
Also, Cygwin is the UNIX-ism platform of choice, and getting the JDK
to build solely with Cygwin (on both 32- and 64-bit, Win2k, WinXP, and
Win2003) would be a _huge_ deal.
I.e. using the gcc provided by Cygwin and the 'posixy' libc it provides?
cheers,
dal
Erik Trimble wrote:
Dalibor Topic wrote:
Erik Trimble wrote:
Also, Cygwin is the UNIX-ism platform of choice, and getting the JDK
to build solely with Cygwin (on both 32- and 64-bit, Win2k, WinXP,
and Win2003) would be a _huge_ deal.
I.e. using the gcc provided by Cygwin and the 'p
t
one at a time at the end of a long build.
-- Jon
sudo apt-get build-dep openjdk-6
should get you the necessary build dependencies installed.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
it is necessarily not as
lightweight as [1].
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1]
http://www.gnu.org/prep/maintain/html_node/External-Libraries.html#External-Libraries
--
***
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F
rebuilding them as static libraries, and then
reconfiguring and rebuilding gcc with them.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
***********
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Mic
udo aptitude install gcc-4.1 g++-4.1
make all CC=gcc-4.1 CPP=g++-4.1
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
***********
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsystems GmbH
Dalibor Topic wrote:
> Douglas Felt wrote:
>
>> I'm running into multiple errors trying to build openjdk 7 on ubuntu
>> 8.10. I downloaded the sources from
>> http://www.java.net/download/openjdk/jdk7/promoted/b40/openjdk-7-ea-src-b40-20_nov_2008.zip
>> as
t.jsp#sa_2
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsystems GmbH Mobile: (+49 177) 2664 192
Nagelsweg 55
he bit making the binary plugs check optional, too.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsystems GmbH Mob
at the moment, while improving the quality of
> the upstream product.
>
> This is going to be quite a lot of work, so we'd appreciate help from
> anyone.
Absolutely - thank you very much for pushing for this, Andrew!
cheers,
da
t; the project?
Volker Simonis wrote a couple of blog entries on how to get started hacking
on the VM, starting with:
http://weblogs.java.net/blog/simonis/archive/2008/01/hotspot_develop.html
have fun!
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor
ification of a recent fix. I
> didn't see
> a new CR get created yet; is that right?
I just created 6832112 for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100045.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic
ification of a recent fix. I
> didn't see
> a new CR get created yet; is that right?
I just created 6832112 for https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/show_bug.cgi?id=100045.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic
ebrev/
Both are fine, thanks for cleaning them up, Kelly. Should
jdk/make/README go as well?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
***********
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robil
735.7/webrev.00/
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
***
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsystems GmbH Mobile: (+49 177) 2664 192
Nagelsw
Thank you for the review, Andrew, I'll update it to use java-openjdk
throughout.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
S
Changeset: 3ac6dcf78232
Author:robilad
Date: 2009-09-23 20:06 +0200
URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk7/build/rev/3ac6dcf78232
6872735: Further update build readme for new platforms
6641691: Bring build readme's up-to-date
Summary: Added build instructions for Debian, Ubuntu 8.04,
Kelly O'Hair wrote:
> Excellent. I approve.
thank you very much, Kelly - pushed to build-gate.
cheers,
dalibor topic
>
> -kto
>
> Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Bringing the docs from OpenJDK 6 and OpenJDK 7 a bit more in line,
>> I offer
o OpenJDK6, it may be.
>
> Is there no way of working around 1.7.1 on our side?
I assume the distributions that ship a patched ant 1.7.1 package could
change the check to accept 1.7.1. Would that work?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
eone will
take care of processing it. Once it's processed it will show up on
https://sca.dev.java.net/CA_signatories.htm and your patches could,
provided they pass reviews, etc, flow into OpenJDK.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*****
ase ask about it on the jdk6-dev
mailing list.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsystems GmbH Mobile: (+49 177
so.
Out of curiosity - do your changes apply to OpenJDK directly, or are they
based on Robert Schuster's cross-compilation work in Jalimo for the
IcedTea build harness? [1]
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1] https://wiki.evolvi
CC variable.
But of course, don't let that discourage you - I am not aware of
anyone actually attempting the build with MinGW, so your experience
(if you post it to this list) would be valuable at least in knowing
where the obstacles
uild so far, so I wouldn't put too
much faith into being able to do that easily.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
*******
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
Sun Microsyst
at would make a 'standard' developer setup as trivial as
it is on other, friendlier operating systems.
> Have you looked at using cmake instead of cygwin?
Cygwin is a 'Linux'-y environment for Windows. Cmake is a build
system. They are not necessarily intercha
s for native code that need to go through a
bootstrapping step to create tools used later in the build are by their
nature non-trivial. Take a look at the gcc build system, for another
example -> ohloh claims that 7% of the gcc code is written in autoconf.
[1] ;)
cheers,
dalibor topic
[1] http://
Pete Brunet wrote:
> Where is the right place to enter JDK7 bugs?
bugs.sun.com.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
***
Dalibor Topic Tel: (+49 40) 23 646 738
Java F/OSS Ambassador AIM: robiladonaim
ds.html file on ZERO/SHARK builds seems
> like a good idea to me.
Agreed.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
<http://www.oracle.com/>
Dalibor Topic
Phone: +49 40 23646738
Oracle
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG | Nagelsweg 55 | 20097 Hamburg
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. KG
Hauptverwaltung:
ives this problem
>
> i copied junit*.jar in to $ANT_HOME/lib
>
> can you please give your inputs here ...
It sounds like you're using the ./configure script from IcedTea. Please ask
on distro-pkg-dev mailing list about it, and mention your distribution there.
Thanks!
we should
just remove
them from the download site for good.
Any objections?
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile: +491772664192
Oracle Java Platform Group
ORACLE Deutschland B.V. & Co. K
On 11/24/10 10:18 PM, Patrick Reinhart wrote:
> I finally got the build done with Fedora 14!
>
> Thanks all your hints.
Congrats, glad to see it all worked out.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +49402364673
On 11/29/10 2:52 AM, Lussier, Denis wrote:
> Aren't the binary plugs still used for vanilla OpenJDK 6 builds that don't
> use Iced Tea??
No.
cheers,
dalibor topic
--
Oracle <http://www.oracle.com>
Dalibor Topic | Java F/OSS Ambassador
Phone: +494023646738 | | | Mobile:
On 11/26/10 3:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 11/26/2010 02:48 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> Hm. It's been a long time since I heard of anyone use the binary plugs for
>> anything.
>> Certainly neither regular OpenJDK builds nor IcedTea builds do. So if they
>> ju
On 11/29/10 5:03 PM, Dr Andrew John Hughes wrote:
> On 15:08 Mon 29 Nov , Dalibor Topic wrote:
>> On 11/26/10 3:54 PM, Andrew Haley wrote:
>>> On 11/26/2010 02:48 PM, Dalibor Topic wrote:
>>
>>>> Hm. It's been a long time since I heard of anyon
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
