Re: Invalid use of -m32 on certain targets

2018-04-13 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz 

Hi Severin!

On 04/13/2018 02:16 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote:

Is there a bug for this already?


Here is one:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201536

Great, thank you. I couldn't reply earlier as I was just on my way.

Adrian

--
 .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
: :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
`. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913

Re: Invalid use of -m32 on certain targets

2018-04-13 Thread Severin Gehwolf 
On Fri, 2018-04-13 at 13:17 +0200, Severin Gehwolf wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 18:56 +0200, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> > > 12 apr. 2018 kl. 15:49 skrev John Paul Adrian Glaubitz 
> > > :
> > > 
> > > Hi!
> > > 
> > > I have been playing around with Zero on new (old) architectures and one
> > > of them is hppa, which needs some additional work due to its stack growing
> > > from bottom to top but that's another story.
> > > 
> > > Anyway, adding hppa to platform.m4 and running configure results in the
> > > following error message:
> > > 
> > > configure:35290: checking whether the C compiler works
> > > configure:35312: /usr/bin/hppa-linux-gnu-gcc -m32-m32   conftest.c  
> > > >&5
> > > hppa-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
> > > hppa-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
> > > configure:35316: $? = 1
> > > configure:35354: result: no
> > > configure: failed program was:
> > > 
> > > Didn't we recently have the discussion about which target gcc versions
> > > understand "-m32" and which don't? Apparently, someone thought hppa's
> > > gcc supports that option but apparently it doesn't.
> > > 
> > > Was there any conclusion on this discussion? I remember that some
> > > people mentioned that the current situation is not ideal.
> > 
> > I agree. It's not ideal, and should be fixed. It's on my todo list
> > but keep sinking to the bottom. If you want, you can open a bug on it
> > and I just might get around to it a bit quicker. :)
> 
> I've just attempted "configure" on s390 and here is what I get:
> configure:35266: checking whether the C compiler works
> configure:35288: /usr/bin/gcc -m32-m32   conftest.c  >&5
> gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
> gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
> configure:35292: $? = 1
> configure:35330: result: no
> configure: failed program was:
> > /* confdefs.h */
> > #define PACKAGE_NAME "OpenJDK"
> > #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "openjdk"
> > #define PACKAGE_VERSION "jdk9"
> > #define PACKAGE_STRING "OpenJDK jdk9"
> > #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "build-dev@openjdk.java.net"
> > #define PACKAGE_URL "http://openjdk.java.net;
> > /* end confdefs.h.  */
> > 
> > int
> > main ()
> > {
> > 
> >   ;
> >   return 0;
> > }
> 
> configure:35335: error: in `/jdk-hs':
> configure:35337: error: C compiler cannot create executables
> 
> Indeed:
>  sh-4.2# gcc -m32 conftest.c 
> gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-m32’
>  sh-4.2# echo $?
> 1
>  sh-4.2# gcc conftest.c
>  sh-4.2# echo $?
> 0 
> 
> This must have broken recently :( I'll take a look. As it's preventing
> me to test JDK-8201495
> 
> Is there a bug for this already?

Here is one:
https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8201536

Cheers,
Severin

> Thanks,
> Severin
> 
> 
> > /Magnus
> > 
> > > 
> > > Adrian
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> > > : :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
> > > `. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
> > >  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
> > > 
> > 
> >

Re: Invalid use of -m32 on certain targets

2018-04-13 Thread Severin Gehwolf 
On Thu, 2018-04-12 at 18:56 +0200, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
> > 12 apr. 2018 kl. 15:49 skrev John Paul Adrian Glaubitz 
> > :
> > 
> > Hi!
> > 
> > I have been playing around with Zero on new (old) architectures and one
> > of them is hppa, which needs some additional work due to its stack growing
> > from bottom to top but that's another story.
> > 
> > Anyway, adding hppa to platform.m4 and running configure results in the
> > following error message:
> > 
> > configure:35290: checking whether the C compiler works
> > configure:35312: /usr/bin/hppa-linux-gnu-gcc -m32-m32   conftest.c  >&5
> > hppa-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
> > hppa-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
> > configure:35316: $? = 1
> > configure:35354: result: no
> > configure: failed program was:
> > 
> > Didn't we recently have the discussion about which target gcc versions
> > understand "-m32" and which don't? Apparently, someone thought hppa's
> > gcc supports that option but apparently it doesn't.
> > 
> > Was there any conclusion on this discussion? I remember that some
> > people mentioned that the current situation is not ideal.
> 
> I agree. It's not ideal, and should be fixed. It's on my todo list
> but keep sinking to the bottom. If you want, you can open a bug on it
> and I just might get around to it a bit quicker. :)

I've just attempted "configure" on s390 and here is what I get:
configure:35266: checking whether the C compiler works
configure:35288: /usr/bin/gcc -m32-m32   conftest.c  >&5
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
configure:35292: $? = 1
configure:35330: result: no
configure: failed program was:
| /* confdefs.h */
| #define PACKAGE_NAME "OpenJDK"
| #define PACKAGE_TARNAME "openjdk"
| #define PACKAGE_VERSION "jdk9"
| #define PACKAGE_STRING "OpenJDK jdk9"
| #define PACKAGE_BUGREPORT "build-dev@openjdk.java.net"
| #define PACKAGE_URL "http://openjdk.java.net;
| /* end confdefs.h.  */
| 
| int
| main ()
| {
| 
|   ;
|   return 0;
| }
configure:35335: error: in `/jdk-hs':
configure:35337: error: C compiler cannot create executables

Indeed:
 sh-4.2# gcc -m32 conftest.c 
gcc: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-m32’
 sh-4.2# echo $?
1
 sh-4.2# gcc conftest.c
 sh-4.2# echo $?
0 

This must have broken recently :( I'll take a look. As it's preventing
me to test JDK-8201495

Is there a bug for this already?

Thanks,
Severin


> /Magnus
> 
> > 
> > Adrian
> > 
> > -- 
> > .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> > : :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
> > `. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
> >  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
> > 
> 
>

Re: Invalid use of -m32 on certain targets

2018-04-12 Thread Magnus Ihse Bursie 

> 12 apr. 2018 kl. 15:49 skrev John Paul Adrian Glaubitz 
> :
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I have been playing around with Zero on new (old) architectures and one
> of them is hppa, which needs some additional work due to its stack growing
> from bottom to top but that's another story.
> 
> Anyway, adding hppa to platform.m4 and running configure results in the
> following error message:
> 
> configure:35290: checking whether the C compiler works
> configure:35312: /usr/bin/hppa-linux-gnu-gcc -m32-m32   conftest.c  >&5
> hppa-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
> hppa-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
> configure:35316: $? = 1
> configure:35354: result: no
> configure: failed program was:
> 
> Didn't we recently have the discussion about which target gcc versions
> understand "-m32" and which don't? Apparently, someone thought hppa's
> gcc supports that option but apparently it doesn't.
> 
> Was there any conclusion on this discussion? I remember that some
> people mentioned that the current situation is not ideal.

I agree. It's not ideal, and should be fixed. It's on my todo list but keep 
sinking to the bottom. If you want, you can open a bug on it and I just might 
get around to it a bit quicker. :)

/Magnus

> 
> Adrian
> 
> -- 
> .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> : :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
> `. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
>  `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
>

Re: Invalid use of -m32 on certain targets

2018-04-12 Thread Thomas Stüfe 
Short note, internally at SAP we have a proprietary port for HPUX
parisc and yes, upward growing stack is quite a problem. We had to
make (and continue to maintain) a lot of downstream changes which deal
with that. So I doubt that even if you manage to build the VM would be
running for long.

Best regards, Thomas

On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:49 PM, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
 wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have been playing around with Zero on new (old) architectures and one
> of them is hppa, which needs some additional work due to its stack growing
> from bottom to top but that's another story.
>
> Anyway, adding hppa to platform.m4 and running configure results in the
> following error message:
>
> configure:35290: checking whether the C compiler works
> configure:35312: /usr/bin/hppa-linux-gnu-gcc -m32-m32   conftest.c  >&5
> hppa-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
> hppa-linux-gnu-gcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-m32'
> configure:35316: $? = 1
> configure:35354: result: no
> configure: failed program was:
>
> Didn't we recently have the discussion about which target gcc versions
> understand "-m32" and which don't? Apparently, someone thought hppa's
> gcc supports that option but apparently it doesn't.
>
> Was there any conclusion on this discussion? I remember that some
> people mentioned that the current situation is not ideal.
>
> Adrian
>
> --
>  .''`.  John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
> : :' :  Debian Developer - glaub...@debian.org
> `. `'   Freie Universitaet Berlin - glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de
>   `-GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546  0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
>