Ah it was run without spec before. Looks good then.
/Erik
On 2018-04-10 14:31, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
On 2018-04-10 23:24, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Nice feature!
Init.gmk: 229 were -> was
Fixed without new webrev.
Otherwise looks good.
Out of curiosity, was there a reason to mov
On 2018-04-10 23:24, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Nice feature!
Init.gmk: 229 were -> was
Fixed without new webrev.
Otherwise looks good.
Out of curiosity, was there a reason to move the log parsing macros
outside of has-spec block? It doesn't look like you changed where you
call these m
Hello,
Nice feature!
Init.gmk: 229 were -> was
Otherwise looks good.
Out of curiosity, was there a reason to move the log parsing macros
outside of has-spec block? It doesn't look like you changed where you
call these macros from.
/Erik
On 2018-04-10 13:54, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
Fro
Hi Magnus,
Thanks a lot for implementing this! I tested this with
--with-log=info,report=none, and it's exactly what I want in my config
script ;)
Thanks,
StefanK
On 2018-04-10 22:54, Magnus Ihse Bursie wrote:
From the bug report:
"The compile errors you get from HotSpot are quite large, a
