Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Thanks but it didn't help :( Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2017-08-14 17:30 GMT+02:00 Tilman Hausherr : > Am 14.08.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: >> >> >>> Our own problems with jdk9 were 1) problems with reflection (solution: we >>>

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Am 14.08.2017 um 10:01 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: Our own problems with jdk9 were 1) problems with reflection (solution: we got rid of the offending code), 2) needing to use "--add-modules" on tests (we changed our pom), 3) problems with JAI (this was fixed by oracle and by a third party). Can

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

2017-08-13 17:19 GMT+02:00 Tilman Hausherr : > I'd wish I could help you but I have not even been able to run the struts > tests on jdk8. Solving this (probably a newbie issue) would just take > valuable time from you. We resolved the problem with JDK8 some time ago and now

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Thanks Tilman! On 12/08/2017 14:39, Tilman Hausherr wrote: Am 08.08.2017 um 11:39 schrieb Rory O'Donnell: Hi Mark & Gavin, Thank you very much for all your testing of JDK 9 during its development! Such contributions have significantly helped shape and improve JDK 9. Now that we have

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Am 13.08.2017 um 09:37 schrieb Lukasz Lenart: The Apache Struts is not :( The build was passing on an early version but right now almost all the tests fail :\ What's funny launching the same particular test from an IDE passes o_O I'd wish I could help you but I have not even been able to run

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

The Apache Struts is not :( The build was passing on an early version but right now almost all the tests fail :\ What's funny launching the same particular test from an IDE passes o_O Any hints? Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ 2017-08-12 15:39 GMT+02:00 Tilman

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Am 08.08.2017 um 11:39 schrieb Rory O'Donnell: Hi Mark & Gavin, Thank you very much for all your testing of JDK 9 during its development! Such contributions have significantly helped shape and improve JDK 9. Now that we have reached the JDK 9 Final Release Candidate phase [1] , I would

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

> On 10 Aug 2017, at 6:03 pm, dalibor topic wrote: > > Hi Gavin, > > thank you - I believe this is > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7024850 and > https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170157 - a deliberate change. > > Per the cryptographic roadmap at

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Hi Gavin, thank you - I believe this is https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-7024850 and https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8170157 - a deliberate change. Per the cryptographic roadmap at https://www.java.com/en/jre-jdk-cryptoroadmap.html, it is planned for the January 2018 CPU

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

All Jenkins and Buildbot nodes should have JDK 9 b181 and JDK 9 b181 (unlimited security) installed and available. See https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/JDK+Installation+Matrix for the Jenkins

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

One piece of feedback for you. conf/security/java.security seems to have ‘crypto.policy=unlimited’ already turned on. That seems backwards and imo should be set to ‘limited’ by default, especially considering this is way it has always been and also from reading the preceding text in that

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Hi Guys For my part - my ‘project’ is ensuring these builds are available on the ASF Build Slaves which include 75+ jenkins nodes and 20+ Buildbot nodes. https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/deployment/modules/build_slaves/manifests/jenkins.pp#L23

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Hello all, (this also answers the same mail I received) PDFBox builds on jdk9. Our efforts can be seen here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-3584 todo for me (will need a few days): - install latest version - retest on second PC (failed last time I tried a few weeks ago) - commit

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Thanks Ismael! Rgds,Rory On 08/08/2017 15:23, Ismael Juma wrote: Hi Rory, Regarding Apache Kafka, we are getting closer (the recently released Gradle 4.1 helped), but there are a few blockers before our test suite passes: 1. EasyMock: https://github.com/easymock/easymock/issues/193. There

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Hi Rory, Regarding Apache Kafka, we are getting closer (the recently released Gradle 4.1 helped), but there are a few blockers before our test suite passes: 1. EasyMock: https://github.com/easymock/easymock/issues/193. There is a PR (https://github.com/easymock/easymock/pull/200), but it's

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Thanks Mark, let us know how the latest version is doing ? Rgds,Rory On 08/08/2017 10:52, Mark Struberg wrote: Hi Rory! First thanks for keeping us up2date with the Java9 status! I guess we will need a bit time to do a final verification of the various projects. To be honest I lost a bit of

Re: Ready for JDK 9 ?

Hi Rory! First thanks for keeping us up2date with the Java9 status! I guess we will need a bit time to do a final verification of the various projects. To be honest I lost a bit of pace because some versions did run fine, the next introduced a total showstopper. I'll have to check whether all