Dne 14.10.2016 v 15:14 Jan Pazdziora napsal(a):
> Wouldn't
>
> ln -s /proc /var/lib/mock/fedora-24-x86_64/root/proc
>
> work?
No, sir.
ln -s /proc /var/lib/mock/fedora-24-x86_64/root/proc
Will create in chroot:
sh-4.3# ls -ld /proc
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root mockbuild 5 Oct 18 09:34 /proc -> /
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 05:44:17PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> So, the unshare()-skipping is working. But I got stuck on
> /bin/mount -n -t proc proc /var/lib/mock/fedora-24-x86_64/root/proc
> This fails in unprivileged containers. And I cannot skip it, because lots of
> RPMs will miss it.
Dne 30.9.2016 v 15:15 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
> Hi,
> I am investigating
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336750
> and honestly I'm not sure what is the right solution.
>
> Right now we use unshare() for CLONE_NEWNS, CLONE_NEWUTS, CLONE_NEWIPC.
>
> I can detect if mock is runnin
On 9/30/16 7:28 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 30.9.2016 v 15:35 Jan Pazdziora napsal(a):
Is there some example of application that might happen to run next to
mock? Running multiple applications in container is typically not
trivial, so user might make an extra effort to achieve that setup.
I
On Friday, September 30, 2016 4:28:08 PM CDT Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 30.9.2016 v 15:35 Jan Pazdziora napsal(a):
> > Is there some example of application that might happen to run next to
> > mock? Running multiple applications in container is typically not
> > trivial, so user might make an extr
Dne 30.9.2016 v 15:35 Jan Pazdziora napsal(a):
> Is there some example of application that might happen to run next to
> mock? Running multiple applications in container is typically not
> trivial, so user might make an extra effort to achieve that setup.
I have no idea. People are weird sometimes
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 03:15:59PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I am investigating
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336750
>> and honestly I'm not sure what is the right solution.
>>
>> Right now we use unshare() fo
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 03:15:59PM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Hi,
> I am investigating
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336750
> and honestly I'm not sure what is the right solution.
>
> Right now we use unshare() for CLONE_NEWNS, CLONE_NEWUTS, CLONE_NEWIPC.
>
> I can detect i