On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Loïc Grenié wrote:
Halp ! A file is missing from last svn.
There seems to be more to it:
modutils/insmod.c: In function 'obj_allocate_commons':
modutils/insmod.c:3085: error: too many arguments to function 'xrealloc'
Cheers,
--
Cristian
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 12:16, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
3. not read - become a master. open .modules.dep.do-not-edit!!! for
exclusive write. all other concurrent modprobes have to wait till the master
closes the file.
This exclusive write stuff is notorious for breaking on
non-local
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 00:32:51 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Hi,
I see that this mdev stuff is not so simple.
Tell me about it. :)
http://landley.net/notes-2008.html#05-05-2008
On Monday 07 July 2008 23:25, Holland, John wrote:
I'm having problems scanning usb_endpoint '/dev's on older
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 03:45:01 Holland, John wrote:
And if they move symlinks around in sysfs again, we
wouldn't need to change the mdev interface.
YES, YOU WILL!
Trust me on this one.
I can link you to flamewars going back to 2005 on this issue, if you'd like.
(Or at least I participated
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 16:40:14 Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
Cool!
But we need to not just process continuations and comments but also to
parse the line into some (possibly variable) amount of
whitespaces-delimited tokens.
There's no obvious reason to mix these two issues. A function that
And if they move symlinks around in sysfs again, we
wouldn't need to change the mdev interface.
YES, YOU WILL!
Trust me on this one.
On the 2.6.19 kernel I've tested using the patch I posted, I haven't found any
duplicate dev files. Emulating this on 2.6.24 was o.k. too.(2.6.19 is on an
hi,
attatched is a patch from Timo Teräs that adds support for modprobe.d
seems like it increase size on my hardened gcc-3.4.6 uclibc setup but
reduce size on glibc + gcc-4.2.3
includes a compilation fix for mtab
-nc
Index: modutils/modprobe.c
I found that this patch helps ifenslave to work correctly.
Kojedzinszky Richard
TvNetWork Nyrt.
E-mail: krichy (at) tvnetwork [dot] hu
PGP: 0x24E79141
Fingerprint = 6847 ECFF EF58 0C09 18A5 16CF 270F 0C6F 24E7 9141--- busybox-1.10.4/networking/ifenslave.c.orig 2008-07-09 16:51:58.0
Hi,
Tar file compression autodetect does not work with very small files.
See below:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]$ echo foo foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]$ tar cjf foo.tar.bz2 foo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]$ tar xf foo.tar.bz2
tar: short read
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]$ echo $?
1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] root]$ tar
On Wed, 2008-07-09 at 17:01 +0200, Natanael Copa wrote:
hi,
attatched is a patch from Timo Teräs that adds support for modprobe.d
seems like it increase size on my hardened gcc-3.4.6 uclibc setup but
reduce size on glibc + gcc-4.2.3
includes a compilation fix for mtab
Some of my
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 14:35:50 Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 16:40:14 Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
Cool!
But we need to not just process continuations and comments but also to
parse the line into some (possibly variable) amount of
whitespaces-delimited tokens.
There's
2008/7/9 Denys Vlasenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 12:16, Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
3. not read - become a master. open .modules.dep.do-not-edit!!! for
exclusive write. all other concurrent modprobes have to wait till the master
closes the file.
This exclusive write stuff is
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
There seems to be more to it:
modutils/insmod.c: In function 'obj_allocate_commons':
modutils/insmod.c:3085: error: too many arguments to function 'xrealloc'
That line reads:
f-sections = xrealloc(f-sections, 2,
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 07:23:55PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
There seems to be more to it:
modutils/insmod.c: In function 'obj_allocate_commons':
modutils/insmod.c:3085: error: too many arguments to function 'xrealloc'
That
Hi all,
there are almost 1 year since I sent my patch to improve mdev and I note
that there is always the same problems (symlinks, max depth,
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2...).
My version works well with or without CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2, I
suggest you to try it and I am open to your
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 08:58, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Loïc Grenié wrote:
Halp ! A file is missing from last svn.
There seems to be more to it:
modutils/insmod.c: In function 'obj_allocate_commons':
modutils/insmod.c:3085: error: too many arguments
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 21:54, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 08:58, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Loïc Grenié wrote:
Halp ! A file is missing from last svn.
There seems to be more to it:
modutils/insmod.c: In function
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 21:54, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 08:58, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Loïc Grenié wrote:
Halp ! A file is missing from last svn.
There seems to be more to it:
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 20:46, Malek wrote:
Hi all,
there are almost 1 year since I sent my patch to improve mdev and I note
that there is always the same problems (symlinks, max depth,
CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2...).
My version works well with or without CONFIG_SYSFS_DEPRECATED_V2, I
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 17:02, Richard Kojedzinszky wrote:
I found that this patch helps ifenslave to work correctly.
Kojedzinszky Richard
TvNetWork Nyrt.
E-mail: krichy (at) tvnetwork [dot] hu
PGP: 0x24E79141
Fingerprint = 6847 ECFF EF58 0C09 18A5 16CF 270F 0C6F 24E7 9141
On Sun, Jul 06, 2008 at 07:23:47PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
On Sunday 06 July 2008 01:42:23 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
The first is to ignore links while traversing,
Yeah, pity mdev author forgot to document why ACTION_FOLLOWLINKS
is necessary (example would be most useful).
What's
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 18:01:17 Tito wrote:
On Wednesday 09 July 2008 14:35:50 Rob Landley wrote:
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 16:40:14 Vladimir Dronnikov wrote:
Cool!
But we need to not just process continuations and comments but also to
parse the line into some (possibly variable)
Hmmm!
1. The only major difference from what I proposed on (09.07.2008 2:16) is to
use a bunch on xmalloc_fgetline() (which in turn uses a bunch of fgetc())
along with malloc/free cycles. I still think then if a file can be processed
in-memory it should be processed in-memory. Though a FEATURE
23 matches
Mail list logo
