On Mit, 2012-02-15 at 03:41 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch
be...@petrovitsch.priv.at wrote:
On Son, 2012-02-12 at 01:26 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 1:14 AM, Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx wrote:
[...]
It
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Bernd Petrovitsch
be...@petrovitsch.priv.at wrote:
On Mit, 2012-02-15 at 03:41 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch
be...@petrovitsch.priv.at wrote:
On Son, 2012-02-12 at 01:26 +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On
Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Ralf Friedl ralf.fri...@online.de
wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote:
True, there are exceptions.
There are more exceptions.
You seem to imply that without enforcement of the GPL, there would
magically
appear more companies who
My (lay) understanding of this is that there are two separate
issues:
1) Company contributes (back) to the project.
2) Company provides sources of whatever they did.
Obviously #1 is preferable, assuming the mods are palatable,
but only #2 is required. It would take an interested (and
possibly
