AW: getty: setsid: Operation not permitted on busybox v1.20.2

2012-08-15 Thread Priebe, Sebastian
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Denys Vlasenko [mailto:vda.li...@googlemail.com] Gesendet: Mittwoch, 15. August 2012 16:22 An: Priebe, Sebastian Cc: busybox@busybox.net Betreff: Re: getty: setsid: Operation not permitted on busybox v1.20.2 >On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Priebe, Sebastia

coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread (was Re: Amusing article about busybox)

2012-08-15 Thread Bradley M. Kuhn
Felipe Contreras wrote at 11:31 (EDT) on Monday: > if you are a big company an a unit used my code by mistake I'm not > going to sue you and screw the rest of your units. I don't think anyone, including those of us in the BusyBox community who enforce the GPL, want to "screw" companies or any of t

Re: [PATCH 1/3] fix literal error warning

2012-08-15 Thread Manuel Zerpies
Hi Laurent, hej guys, > Worse: these changes are *harmful*. > > It's ugly, and we really should not rely on that, and Manuel cannot be > blamed for not knowing it, but gcc performs a lot of magic around printf(). > In this case, the bit of magic that interests us is that > printf(CONSTANT) >

Re: udhcpc6 segfault

2012-08-15 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Pramod Bhagwat wrote: > static char **fill_envp(struct d6_packet *packet) > { > char **envp, **curr; > > client6_data.env_ptr = NULL; > client6_data.env_idx = 0; > > *new_env() = xasprintf("interface=%s", client_config.interface); >

Re: Suggestion: increate username buffer size in login.c

2012-08-15 Thread Dmitry Golubovsky
Hi, On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Dmitry Golubovsky > wrote: >> May I suggest increase USERNAME_SIZE to 256 at least? > > Let's set it to 64 for now. Changed in git. OK Thanks. -- Dmitry Golubovsky Anywhere on the Web

Re: Suggestion: increate username buffer size in login.c

2012-08-15 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Dmitry Golubovsky wrote: > May I suggest increase USERNAME_SIZE to 256 at least? Let's set it to 64 for now. Changed in git. ___ busybox mailing list busybox@busybox.net http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox

Re: getty: setsid: Operation not permitted on busybox v1.20.2

2012-08-15 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Priebe, Sebastian wrote: > Hello, > > I get " getty: setsid: Operation not permitted" if calling "getty 921600 > tty0". Please find this place in getty.c: pid = getpid(); if (getsid(0) != pid) bb_perror_ms

Re: telinit in current snapshot

2012-08-15 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:24 AM, jimux wrote: > I am attempting to cross-compile an SH4 version of the current snapshot for a > satellite set top box. All other tools work fine, but attempts to restart > init > from a telnet session (ie init 4: sleep 8: enigma2 ) fail with a 'init must > be PI

Re: telinit in current snapshot

2012-08-15 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 9:24 AM, jimux wrote: > I am attempting to cross-compile an SH4 version of the current snapshot for a > satellite set top box. All other tools work fine, but attempts to restart > init > from a telnet session (ie init 4: sleep 8: enigma2 ) fail with a 'init must > be PI

Re: getty: setsid: Operation not permitted on busybox v1.20.2

2012-08-15 Thread Tito
On Wednesday 15 August 2012 10:00:54 Priebe, Sebastian wrote: > Hello, > > I get " getty: setsid: Operation not permitted" if calling "getty 921600 > tty0". > I want to call getty from init to provide a login. > > Thanks for the help. > Sebastian > Hi, from man 2 setsid: SETSID(2)

getty: setsid: Operation not permitted on busybox v1.20.2

2012-08-15 Thread Priebe, Sebastian
Hello, I get " getty: setsid: Operation not permitted" if calling "getty 921600 tty0". I want to call getty from init to provide a login. Thanks for the help. Sebastian --- +++ Willkommen bei CADCON auf der ILA Berlin Air S

Re: Bug in mountpoint applet?

2012-08-15 Thread Michael Tokarev
On 15.08.2012 05:58, Harald Becker wrote: [] > The util linux version has the device node compare as a fallback > method. So why not have a global config option to enable the usage > of /mnt/self/mountinfo ... for those who neglect to use such kind of > interfaces. As I mentioned already, this met