Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread (was Re: Amusing article about busybox)

2012-09-24 Thread Felipe Contreras
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Friday 24 August 2012 18:20:12 Felipe Contreras wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn bk...@ebb.org wrote: Felipe Contreras wrote at 11:31 (EDT) on Monday: if you are a big company an a unit used my code

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread (was Re: Amusing article about busybox)

2012-09-24 Thread William Haddon
On 09/24/2012 10:37:11 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Friday 24 August 2012 18:20:12 Felipe Contreras wrote: So if part of the company makes good efforts, and another part of the company does not, the company as a whole

Re: [PATCH] Add xorpipe utility

2012-09-24 Thread Ed W
Hi My rationale behind writing this simple utility is as follows: Moving data through a fully encrypted tunnel like SSH is too slow for me, so I use netcat/socat for moving large chunks of data between systems. I don't want the data to be easily identified and reproduced if it is somehow

Re: [PATCH] Add xorpipe utility

2012-09-24 Thread Ed W
On 13/09/2012 10:26, Michael Conrad wrote: On 9/12/2012 10:42 PM, j...@jodybruchon.com wrote: My rationale behind writing this simple utility is as follows: Moving data through a fully encrypted tunnel like SSH is too slow for me, so I use netcat/socat for moving large chunks of data between

utmp fix for mips64 uClibc systems

2012-09-24 Thread Waldemar Brodkorb
Hi Developers, I have some strange problem with getty, init and login on mips64 uClibc (0.9.33.2) systems: qemu-system-mips64, big endian, n64 lemote yeelong, little endian, n32 Following test code segfaults: #include sys/types.h #include sys/stat.h #include fcntl.h #include unistd.h int

Re: coordinated compliance efforts addresses the issues of this thread (was Re: Amusing article about busybox)

2012-09-24 Thread Tito
On Monday 24 September 2012 16:37:11 you wrote: On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote: On Friday 24 August 2012 18:20:12 Felipe Contreras wrote: On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn bk...@ebb.org wrote: Felipe Contreras wrote at 11:31 (EDT) on

Re: utmp fix for mips64 uClibc systems

2012-09-24 Thread Dan Fandrich
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 09:12:01PM +0200, Waldemar Brodkorb wrote: +if (access(filename, R_OK | W_OK) == -1) { +c=open(filename, O_WRONLY | O_CREAT, 0664); +if (c 0) { 0 is a perfectly valid file descriptor. This should be c = 0, or just use xopen().

RE: utmp fix for mips64 uClibc systems

2012-09-24 Thread Cathey, Jim
This is a uLibc fault. A common idiom, from way back, is: close(creat(...)); Close is supposed to be able to survive being given a negative number. -- Jim -Original Message- From: busybox-boun...@busybox.net [mailto:busybox-boun...@busybox.net] On Behalf Of Waldemar Brodkorb