i am not an expert on that stuff but perhaps it is sufficient to set
discover_retries to something very large ?
For a computer infinity means until the end of time something humans
normally do not do anticipate.
re,
wh
Am 25.09.2012 14:06, schrieb Florian Fainelli:
From: Felix Fietkau
Am 25.09.2012 21:04, schrieb Tito:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 17:52:17 walter harms wrote:
Am 25.09.2012 14:06, schrieb Florian Fainelli:
From: Nicolas Thill n...@openwrt.org
This patch disable supplementary groups handling in id with uClibc versions
prior to v0.9.30, which are lacking
bump.
On Wed, Aug 01, 2012 at 03:27:31PM +0200, Manuel Zerpies wrote:
The variable unsigned opts is not used. It saves an necessary
call to getopts32().
Signed-off-by: Manuel Zerpies manuel.f.zerp...@ww.stud.uni-erlangen.de
---
Hi,
maybe this patch is better. It calls getopts32() and
bump.
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 03:15:51PM +0200, Manuel Zerpies wrote:
From: Manuel Zerpies manuel.f.zerp...@ww.stud.uni-erlangen.de
Check the return values of read(), write() and fgets().
Signed-off-by: Manuel Zerpies manuel.f.zerp...@ww.stud.uni-erlangen.de
---
applets/applet_tables.c
bump.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 01:51:21PM +0200, Manuel Zerpies wrote:
Hej guys,
[]
-bb_perror_msg(filename);
+bb_perror_msg(%s, filename);
Please stop fixing a non-issue. This GCC warning is wrong.
This has been discussed several times, and exactly the
On Wednesday 26 September 2012 11:47:20 walter harms wrote:
Am 25.09.2012 21:04, schrieb Tito:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 17:52:17 walter harms wrote:
Am 25.09.2012 14:06, schrieb Florian Fainelli:
From: Nicolas Thill n...@openwrt.org
This patch disable supplementary groups
Am 26.09.2012 13:44, schrieb Tito:
On Wednesday 26 September 2012 11:47:20 walter harms wrote:
Am 25.09.2012 21:04, schrieb Tito:
On Tuesday 25 September 2012 17:52:17 walter harms wrote:
Am 25.09.2012 14:06, schrieb Florian Fainelli:
From: Nicolas Thill n...@openwrt.org
This patch
I am pretty convinced this thread isn't useful anymore. We all know
you're against GPL enforcement, Felipe.
Felipe Contreras wrote at 10:37 (EDT) on Monday:
I might be complying with it to the letter, but somebody in another
team might not be, and I might suffer.
To my knowledge, at least in
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:41 PM, James Ronald james.ron...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an issue where top is corrupting stdin (consuming the first
byte or two) when being used in a CGI script and executed before
reading POST data being passed via standard in. Of course, executing
top after the
Denys,
Thanks for the quick patch. The patch does work when specifying batch
(-b) but still fails if batch is not specified.
- Jim
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Denys Vlasenko
vda.li...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 4:41 PM, James Ronald james.ron...@gmail.com wrote:
10 matches
Mail list logo