On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:59 PM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
cristian.ionescu-idbo...@axis.com wrote:
i = full_read(archive_handle-src_fd, tar, 512);
- /* If GNU tar sees EOF in above read, it says:
-* tar: A lone zero block at N, where N = kilobyte
-* where EOF
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
Please try attached patch.
looks good for consolidation of the other loginutils but for sulogin
it makes implementing the locked root account feature more difficult
Why difficult?
...
pwd = getpwuid(0);
if
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Bartosz Gołaszewski
bartekg...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/5 Bartosz Gołaszewski bartekg...@gmail.com:
Anyway, what do you think about the unit tests then?
Any comments?
I think it's best to keep tests in the same source files where
tested function is. This way
On Wednesday 20 November 2013 13:25:15 you wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
Please try attached patch.
looks good for consolidation of the other loginutils but for sulogin
it makes implementing the locked root account feature more difficult
Why
Add a new return value to ask_and_check_password() to signify this condition.
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Wednesday 20 November 2013 13:25:15 you wrote:
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
Please try attached patch.
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 2:07 PM, souf souf_o...@yahoo.fr wrote:
Hi all,
Use xasprintf instead of sprintf
I applied only the conversion to new style part.
Your bloatcheck looks suspect. Did you look at assembly
why it is so much smaller?
___
busybox
Hi Denys !
+ if (pwd-pw_passwd == !) ...
Do you mean
if (pwd-pw_passwd[0] == !) ...
?
--
Harald
___
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
