This is needed for, eg, hurd, which is known to have no constraints.
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru
diff --git a/libbb/xreadlink.c b/libbb/xreadlink.c
index ec95af2..a610de8 100644
--- a/libbb/xreadlink.c
+++ b/libbb/xreadlink.c
@@ -8,6 +8,12 @@
#include libbb.h
+/* some
Signed-off-by: Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru
diff --git a/coreutils/expand.c b/coreutils/expand.c
index 25bbffc..8d376ff 100644
--- a/coreutils/expand.c
+++ b/coreutils/expand.c
@@ -78,11 +78,7 @@ static void expand(FILE *file, unsigned tab_size, unsigned
opt)
That meant to be unicode_strwidth() not printable_string(). Typo in the
subject.
/mjt
___
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox
Hello.
Here are a few tests from the testsuite which fails on debian-hurd and
debian-kfreebsd.
awk handles non-existing file correctly
on hurd ENOENT is 0x4002, the test expects 2.
It is not portable to expect certain errno values. Different OSes may
use different values for the same
09.12.2013 17:51, Michael Tokarev пишет:
Forgot to comment on this:
tar symlinks mode (both kfreebsd and hurd)
--- expected
+++ actual
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
input_dir/input_file
-input_dir/input_soft - input_file
+input_dir/input_soft - input_dir/input_file
input_file -
Hello,
Attached patch adds basic selinux support to mdev in what I think is
most efficient way. It relabels file not caring if it was just created
or existed before (for example devtmpfs mount).
Amadeusz Sławiński
diff -uNr a/util-linux/mdev.c b/util-linux/mdev.c
--- a/util-linux/mdev.c
There's no reason to call gethostbyname() on the value returned
by uname() when asked just for a short name of a host. This may
also be wrong, when uname is set to one value, but in /etc/hosts
(or elsewhere) the canonical name is different. This is often
the case for localhost entry in
On Monday 09 December 2013 18:56:43 Michael Tokarev wrote:
There's no reason to call gethostbyname() on the value returned
by uname() when asked just for a short name of a host. This may
also be wrong, when uname is set to one value, but in /etc/hosts
(or elsewhere) the canonical name is
10.12.2013 01:40, Tito wrote:
On Monday 09 December 2013 18:56:43 Michael Tokarev wrote:
There's no reason to call gethostbyname() on the value returned
by uname() when asked just for a short name of a host. This may
also be wrong, when uname is set to one value, but in /etc/hosts
(or
On Monday 09 December 2013 22:56:34 you wrote:
10.12.2013 01:40, Tito wrote:
On Monday 09 December 2013 18:56:43 Michael Tokarev wrote:
There's no reason to call gethostbyname() on the value returned
by uname() when asked just for a short name of a host. This may
also be wrong, when
10 matches
Mail list logo