AW: busybox Digest, Vol 145, Issue 1

2017-08-01 Thread LAWO
The size oft the buffered and the cached memory seems a bit large and probably has the wrong unit. Best regards, Fynn -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20170801/934d2006/attachment-0001

Re: BusyBox top buffered and the cached memory

2017-08-01 Thread Kang-Che Sung
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Klaaßen, Fynn (LAWO) wrote: > > I guess, there is a trivial bug when using busybox top: > > BusyBox v1.22.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1) multi-call binary: > > Mem: 3278296K used, 1236784K free, 0K shrd, 35373432K buff, 140001458828604K >

BusyBox top buffered and the cached memory

2017-08-01 Thread LAWO
Hey! I guess, there is a trivial bug when using busybox top: BusyBox v1.22.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1) multi-call binary: Mem: 3278296K used, 1236784K free, 0K shrd, 35373432K buff, 140001458828604K cached …or… BusyBox v1.22.1: Mem: 559252K used, 1413876K free, 0K shrd, 160503248K buff,