The size oft the buffered and the cached memory seems a bit large and probably
has the wrong unit.
Best regards,
Fynn
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20170801/934d2006/attachment-0001
On Tue, Aug 1, 2017 at 3:44 PM, Klaaßen, Fynn (LAWO)
wrote:
>
> I guess, there is a trivial bug when using busybox top:
>
> BusyBox v1.22.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1) multi-call binary:
>
> Mem: 3278296K used, 1236784K free, 0K shrd, 35373432K buff, 140001458828604K
>
Hey!
I guess, there is a trivial bug when using busybox top:
BusyBox v1.22.1 (Ubuntu 1:1.22.0-15ubuntu1) multi-call binary:
Mem: 3278296K used, 1236784K free, 0K shrd, 35373432K buff, 140001458828604K
cached
…or…
BusyBox v1.22.1:
Mem: 559252K used, 1413876K free, 0K shrd, 160503248K buff,