With respect to the message from Pavel Aronsky
on 03/17/2017 11:20 AM:
---
Apologies for maybe a wild or off-topic question.
After dealing with quite a few products with busybox and its ash shell
used as the primary scripting language, I'd
On 17/03/17 15:20, Pavel Aronsky wrote:
Apologies for maybe a wild or off-topic question.
After dealing with quite a few products with busybox and its ash shell
used as the primary scripting language, I'd like to ask you, busybox
experts: what are alternatives?
This page:
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 11:20 PM, Pavel Aronsky wrote:
> Apologies for maybe a wild or off-topic question.
> After dealing with quite a few products with busybox and its ash shell used
> as the primary scripting language, I'd like to ask you, busybox experts:
> what are
Thanks for the suggestion. I am not familiar with yocto.
If they can cross compile Python (that is very hard, as google results show),
it would be great. I'll look at it.
Regards,
Pavel A
> On 17 Mar 2017, at 17:23, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>
> Why do you need a scripting
Why do you need a scripting language in the busybox project?
Cannot you just generate the platform with things like a small subset of
python using Yocto or something similar?
On Fri, Mar 17, 2017 at 3:20 PM, Pavel Aronsky
wrote:
> Apologies for maybe a wild or
Apologies for maybe a wild or off-topic question.
After dealing with quite a few products with busybox and its ash shell used
as the primary scripting language, I'd like to ask you, busybox experts:
what are alternatives?
This page: https://busybox.net/tinyutils.html - mentions Lua and