On 06/26/2018 07:37 AM, Walter Harms wrote:
> there is no static version of gnu-libc.
There is absolutely a libc.a provided by GNU libc, and you can
statically link it on account of it's a static library.
I'm looking at it right now, along with the binaries which are,
successfully, statically
On 06/25/2018 11:01 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> I went ahead and built a static version of busybox, but it increase the size
> by
> about 900K.
>
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1280672 Jun 26 08:46 busybox
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 383700 Jun 26 08:12 busybox.save
It's expected that static
busybox@busybox.net
Subject: Re: Question: Finding libraries that are required for
busybox??
> Am 25.06.2018 22:40, schrieb Eli Schwartz:
> > On 06/25/2018 04:30 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> >> Thanks for all the quick reponses. Tried the options, but am jus
On 25 Jun 2018 at 16:35, Jody Bruchon wrote:
Subject:Re: Question: Finding libraries that are required for
busybox??
To: busybox@busybox.net
From: Jody Bruchon
Date sent: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 16:35:57 -0400
> libc.so.6 is the o
On 06/25/2018 04:30 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Thanks for all the quick reponses. Tried the options, but am just seeing a
> link
> to libc.so.6 and no other libraries??
So your busybox binary is not statically linked. That doesn't really
change anything.
If your project depends on GNU
libc.so.6 is the only thing that's linked to your binary directly; the
other libraries can't be detected in these ways so you won't see them.
On 6/25/2018 4:30 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
On 25 Jun 2018 at 15:30, Eli Schwartz wrote:
Subject:Re: Question: Finding libraries
On 25 Jun 2018 at 15:30, Eli Schwartz wrote:
Subject:Re: Question: Finding libraries that are required for busybox??
To: busybox@busybox.net
From: Eli Schwartz
Date sent: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 15:30:21 -0400
> On 06/25/2018 03:20 PM, Jody Bruchon wrote:
> > By the way
On 06/25/2018 03:20 PM, Jody Bruchon wrote:
> By the way, you can also grab the relocations directly from the
> binary with this horrific expression (replace the path as needed):
>
> readelf -d /bin/busybox | sed 's/.*\[\([^]]*\)]/\1/'
>
> Scary but effective.
That's some very complicated sed
That's a glib-specific issue. The network resolver loads the libnss_* files on
demand based on the contents of /etc/nsswitch.conf and there is no way I'm
aware of to probe for such on-demand loads (though I'm sure a way exists, it's
probably unpleasant.) In my experience, this is limited to
Using busybox nslookup failed due to one of the libraries I had removed
not
being there? libnss_dns and libnss_files. ldd busybox doesn't report
these
libraries are used? Once I put those libraries back, the nslookup
resolves.
That's because those shared libraries are not used at build
On 06/25/2018 03:01 PM, Michael D. Setzer II wrote:
> Ran into a problem when trying to clean up libraries that were not needed
> within my project.
>
> Had done an ldd command on all programs and libraries, and created a list.
> A number of libraries I had in project were not linked to any
Am 25.06.2018 um 21:01 schrieb Michael D. Setzer II:
Using busybox nslookup failed due to one of the libraries I had removed not
being there? libnss_dns and libnss_files. ldd busybox doesn't report these
libraries are used? Once I put those libraries back, the nslookup resolves.
Is there a way
12 matches
Mail list logo
