You can turn it how you want yet every entity that distributes
busybox, as it is about busybox GPL license enforcement we are
talking
all the time, must distribute also the source code unmodified or
not,
there is nothing you can do about it as it is impossible to change
the license.
If the end
On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:35 PM, farmat...@tiscali.it
farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
By reading carefully what is stated above I nowhere see the word
developer
nor anything about how many lines of code were written.
The rights stated above refer to the end user who get a copy of the
binary
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 11:58 PM, farmat...@tiscali.it
farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
I care that busybox is used by people willing to follow the GPL
license
No, you clearly don't. You care only by people that are in clear
situations, not the ones in the situation that I've described multiple
Hi,
one more argument will show how your position
about the number of developers involved in enforcement
and the number of lines of code written by them is
totally wrong.
That is probably due to the fact that you yourself are a
developer and therefore your view of things is biased.
Let us go to
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2012 16:37:11 you wrote:
True, the law doesn't make any distinction, which is part of the problem.
You are contraddicting yourself. The law doesn't make any distinction
and this is a matter of fact,
Il 11/10/2012 12:11, Felipe Contreras ha scritto:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 9:29 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it
wrote:
On Monday 24 September 2012 16:37:11 you wrote:
True, the law doesn't make any distinction, which is part of the
problem.
You are contraddicting yourself. The law doesn't make
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Friday 24 August 2012 18:20:12 Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn bk...@ebb.org wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote at 11:31 (EDT) on Monday:
if you are a big company an a unit used my code
On 09/24/2012 10:37:11 AM, Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Friday 24 August 2012 18:20:12 Felipe Contreras wrote:
So if part of the company makes good efforts, and another part of
the
company does not, the company as a whole
On Monday 24 September 2012 16:37:11 you wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it wrote:
On Friday 24 August 2012 18:20:12 Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn bk...@ebb.org wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote at 11:31 (EDT) on
bounced due to non-subscribed alias. Probably not worthy reading...
--- On Sat, 25/8/12, Hin-Tak Leung ... wrote:
--- On Fri, 24/8/12, Tito farmat...@tiscali.it
wrote:
snipped
There is not something like a part of company.
Ther is a company that produces a product and then
sells
it
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn bk...@ebb.org wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote at 11:31 (EDT) on Monday:
if you are a big company an a unit used my code by mistake I'm not
going to sue you and screw the rest of your units.
I don't think anyone, including those of us in the
On Friday 24 August 2012 18:20:12 Felipe Contreras wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Bradley M. Kuhn bk...@ebb.org wrote:
Felipe Contreras wrote at 11:31 (EDT) on Monday:
if you are a big company an a unit used my code by mistake I'm not
going to sue you and screw the rest of your
Felipe Contreras wrote at 11:31 (EDT) on Monday:
if you are a big company an a unit used my code by mistake I'm not
going to sue you and screw the rest of your units.
I don't think anyone, including those of us in the BusyBox community who
enforce the GPL, want to screw companies or any of
13 matches
Mail list logo
