Re: ifenslave / ifupdown bonding support

2015-03-26 Thread Michael Sumulong
Ok that looks promising. So for pre-down I'd add right after the pre-up line?: pre-down ifenslave -d bond eth4 eth9 On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 11:43 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote: On 26 March 2015 at 14:57, Michael Sumulong msumul...@gmail.com wrote: I am currently

Re: ifenslave / ifupdown bonding support

2015-03-26 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
Please do not top-post. On 26 March 2015 at 17:25, Michael Sumulong msumul...@gmail.com wrote: Ok that looks promising. So for pre-down I'd add right after the pre-up line?: pre-down ifenslave -d bond eth4 eth9 IIRC ifdown bond0 should release the slaves. me@there .../src/linux $ git grep

Re: ifenslave / ifupdown bonding support

2015-03-26 Thread Timo Teras
On Thu, 26 Mar 2015 09:57:31 -0400 Michael Sumulong msumul...@gmail.com wrote: I am currently using BusyBox 1.22.1 and would like to be able to setup network interface bonding via my /etc/network/interfaces file but I'm not sure if there's any support for bonding in ifupdown.c. Can anyone

ifenslave / ifupdown bonding support

2015-03-26 Thread Michael Sumulong
I am currently using BusyBox 1.22.1 and would like to be able to setup network interface bonding via my /etc/network/interfaces file but I'm not sure if there's any support for bonding in ifupdown.c. Can anyone confirm this is true or am I missing something?

Re: ifenslave / ifupdown bonding support

2015-03-26 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 26 March 2015 at 14:57, Michael Sumulong msumul...@gmail.com wrote: I am currently using BusyBox 1.22.1 and would like to be able to setup network interface bonding via my /etc/network/interfaces file but I'm not sure if there's any support for bonding in ifupdown.c. Can anyone confirm this