On Tuesday 01 April 2008 23:37:38 L. Gabriel Somlo wrote:
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 12:14:14AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
Imagine that I have *two* interfaces, both sit on DHCP configured
networks (*different* networks).
Here one deconfig-ed iface will happily nuke /etc/resolv.conf
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 17:40, EXTERNAL Tetz Torsten (Praktikant;
ST-FIR/ENG1) wrote:
# patch -p1 12.diff
patching file Config.in
patching file Rules.mak
patching file archival/Makefile.in
patching file include/platform.h
patching file libbb/Makefile.in
patching
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 02:58, L. Gabriel Somlo wrote:
I am thinking - maybe we should just junk the idea of default
options to ask for? We can ask user to always provide explicit
list of -O OPTs to ask. What do you think?
I agree. Although others might yell at us if we change default
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 14:31, EXTERNAL Tetz Torsten (Praktikant;
ST-FIR/ENG1) wrote:
Hello,
it is this change that makes a segfaulting version out of 1.2.1.
--- busybox-1.2.1/Rules.mak Sat Jul 29 00:55:51 2006
+++ busybox-1.2.2/Rules.mak Tue Oct 24 22:22:03 2006
(...)
@@ -265,7
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 14:31, EXTERNAL Tetz Torsten (Praktikant;
ST-FIR/ENG1) wrote:
Hello,
it is this change that makes a segfaulting version out of 1.2.1.
--- busybox-1.2.1/Rules.mak Sat Jul 29 00:55:51 2006
+++ busybox-1.2.2/Rules.mak Tue Oct 24 22:22:03
L. Gabriel Somlo schrieb:
I am thinking - maybe we should just junk the idea of default
options to ask for? We can ask user to always provide explicit
list of -O OPTs to ask. What do you think?
I agree. Although others might yell at us if we change default
behavior :)
Please take a look
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 04:30:53PM +0200, EXTERNAL Tetz Torsten (Praktikant;
ST-FIR/ENG1) wrote:
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
that last gcc command calls the linker,
and I bet it will be slightly different.
What exactly will be the difference?
Hello,
I attached the output of the last gcc command
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 16:30, EXTERNAL Tetz Torsten (Praktikant;
ST-FIR/ENG1) wrote:
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 14:31, EXTERNAL Tetz Torsten (Praktikant;
ST-FIR/ENG1) wrote:
Hello,
it is this change that makes a segfaulting version out of 1.2.1.
---
Support to physically write output file data before finishing.
Index: dd.c
===
--- dd.c(revision 21619)
+++ dd.c(working copy)
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@
FLAG_NOTRUNC = 1 2,
FLAG_TWOBUFS = 1
- Original Message -
From: Denys Vlasenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harald Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: busybox@busybox.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init.c, halt command not working
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 23:41, Harald Kuethe wrote:
-
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 22:03, James Simmons wrote:
Support to physically write output file data before finishing.
Index: dd.c
===
--- dd.c (revision 21619)
+++ dd.c (working copy)
@@ -87,6 +87,7 @@
On Wednesday 02 April 2008 22:50, Harald Kuethe wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Denys Vlasenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Harald Kuethe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: busybox@busybox.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2008 11:51 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] init.c, halt command not working
On
12 matches
Mail list logo
