- Original Message -
From: Denys Vlasenko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gilles Espinasse [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Busybox busybox@busybox.net
Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 1:45 AM
Subject: Re: busybox-1.12.1=1.12.2 gzip regression (was ash regression)
...
First I find a very different issue
Hi!
I'm new on the list. But I'm working and experimenting with busybox
since two years.
For one of our projects, I've started to implement parts of mtd-utils
(flash_eraseall, nandwrite, etc) in busybox.
Because ext2-utils also are avaliable in busybox, I think it would be a
good idea to
Hi people,
what do you think about this fat/uuid issue?
It would be great if you could maybe tell me if you ever experienced such
things.
Best regards,
Clemens Helfmeir
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 04:02:31PM +0100, Clemens Helfmeier wrote:
Hi everybody,
I am new to the list.
There is a
I think it would be a good idea to implement the whole mtd-utils in busybox
BB has an excellent library. You'll find it simplifies otherwise boring
things. I vote pro.
--
Vladimir
___
busybox mailing list
busybox@busybox.net
textdata bss dec hex filename
7379 9322440 1075129ff /sbin/nandwrite
8278 332 44865421ce /sbin/flash_eraseall
54203 640 464 55307d80b /bin/cp
Hopefully it makes more clear why having 'cp' in busybox makes more sense
that
