Re: run-parts unsorted ?

2007-09-24 Thread Tommi Kyntola
Ack, seems to work just fine. Runs and lists them in sorted order which is just great. cheers, Tommi Kynde Kyntola Denys Vlasenko wrote: On Thursday 13 September 2007 08:52, Tommi Kyntola wrote: Sorry, I meant between 1.5 and 1.6. The 1.5 and 1.4 have essentially the same run_parts.c

nsupdate

2007-09-24 Thread Ralf Friedl
Hi I'm looking for something like nsupdate (Update DNS records, RFC2136). Is there something like that in busybox? If not, should it be included? I compiled nsupdate from bind for my target system, but the binary is larger that 1MB. Regards Ralf Friedl

Re: nsupdate

2007-09-24 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 24 September 2007, Ralf Friedl wrote: I'm looking for something like nsupdate (Update DNS records, RFC2136). Is there something like that in busybox? i'm pretty sure there isnt ... If not, should it be included? anything that should be in busybox already is ... anything beyond

Re: brctl (was: nsupdate)

2007-09-24 Thread Natanael Copa
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:10 +0200, Ralf Friedl wrote: A related question, do you think it would be useful to have a brctl utility in busybox to configure Linux network bridges? Yes! The standalone brctl is about 40k, so I don't know whether there is much space to be saved by including

Re: brctl (was: nsupdate)

2007-09-24 Thread Natanael Copa
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 15:15 +0200, Bernhard Fischer wrote: On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:32:15PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:10 +0200, Ralf Friedl wrote: A related question, do you think it would be useful to have a brctl utility in busybox to configure Linux network

Re: brctl (was: nsupdate)

2007-09-24 Thread Bernhard Fischer
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 03:21:07PM +0200, Natanael Copa wrote: In my hardened uclibc system (with SSP overhead): # ls -l /sbin/brctl -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 26468 Apr 10 09:08 /sbin/brctl Sounds much more reasonable. I'd have guessed 7000 as vaguely reasonable, but i didn't look at it's

Re: [PATCH] ash fancy prompt expansion

2007-09-24 Thread Natanael Copa
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 23:36 +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote: On Friday 21 September 2007 20:15, Natanael Copa wrote: Looks like it got worse, not better... I am attaching my .config too. How does it look with your config and without the patch? It works without the patch. Your config

Insmod problem with busybox 1.4.2

2007-09-24 Thread Evert Meulie
Hi! I'm having some minor problems with insmod/busybox 1.4.2. I'm trying to force-load a module using 'insmod -f' When I try this on the system, I get: insmod: -f.ko: no module by that name found . That would suggest the insmod version does not support this parameter. So then I tried

Re: Insmod problem with busybox 1.4.2

2007-09-24 Thread Stephen Beaver
You need to provide the module name. - insmod -f keyspan' to force installation of he keyspan.ko module for example. On 9/24/07 1:37 PM, Evert Meulie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! I'm having some minor problems with insmod/busybox 1.4.2. I'm trying to force-load a module using 'insmod -f'

Re: Insmod problem with busybox 1.4.2

2007-09-24 Thread Evert Meulie
Eehh, that is exactly what I did. My command was: insmod -f bs.ko (bs.ko was present in the current directory) This returned: insmod: -f.ko: no module by that name found Regards, Evert Stephen Beaver wrote: You need to provide the module name. - insmod -f keyspan' to force

Re: Insmod problem with busybox 1.4.2

2007-09-24 Thread Denys Vlasenko
On Monday 24 September 2007 20:41, Evert Meulie wrote: Eehh, that is exactly what I did. My command was: insmod -f bs.ko (bs.ko was present in the current directory) This returned: insmod: -f.ko: no module by that name found for me it works: $ ./busybox insmod -f zz.ko insmod:

Re: Insmod problem with busybox 1.4.2

2007-09-24 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Evert, On Monday 24 September 2007 21:41:06 Evert Meulie wrote: Eehh, that is exactly what I did. My command was: insmod -f bs.ko (bs.ko was present in the current directory) insmod: -f.ko: no module by that name found Usage: insmod [OPTION]... MODULE [symbol=value]... Options:

Re: Insmod problem with busybox 1.4.2

2007-09-24 Thread Stephen Beaver
Your email says: I'm trying to force-load a module using 'insmod -f' On 9/24/07 3:41 PM, Evert Meulie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Eehh, that is exactly what I did. My command was: insmod -f bs.ko (bs.ko was present in the current directory) This returned: insmod: -f.ko: no module

Re: Insmod problem with busybox 1.4.2

2007-09-24 Thread Evert Meulie
Yes, just like someone would say 'I am trying to compile a program with gcc'... The name of the module is not relevant in my case, so I only listed the command and the parameter. Anyway. 'insmod -f' should NEVER give 'insmod: -f.ko: no module by that name found' as error. Without the module