On Thursday 10 July 2008 00:18, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
What's ACTION_FOLLOWLINKS? I don't see it in the 1.10.0
util-linux/mdev.c...
Here:
...
recursive_action(/sys/block,
ACTION_RECURSE | ACTION_FOLLOWLINKS,
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 09:19:38AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Thursday 10 July 2008 00:18, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
What's ACTION_FOLLOWLINKS? I don't see it in the 1.10.0
util-linux/mdev.c...
Here:
...
recursive_action(/sys/block,
Vladimir, can you try these two patches on top on current svn?
In my limited testing they work.
This one fixes a small buglet with gpl and strings finding their way
into depfile, and also makes depmod usable. depmod is needed for people
which build kernel and install modules, then reboot with
sorry for delay,
i was away for 2 weeks.
imho it is useful
1. You can have all config stuff in one place
2. that makes testing etc. more easy as httpd can be
in a ROM while a simple config is/should be in a
write able space (read: that is the case here)
3. most people are used to config
[CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/7/10 Vladimir Dronnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
and also makes depmod usable...
depmod should be synonym to rm -f /path/modules.dep.bb; modprobe, IMO.
Tell this to somebody who will be bitten by depmod -F System.map -ae 2.6.30
not working as expected during kernel build.
THe discussion have to happen on the mailing list!
Please CC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/7/10 Vladimir Dronnikov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I liked the idea of not needing depfile at all and still
being reasonably fast. And it's actually YOUR idea -
I based my work on your depfile-less patch.
:)
The
Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 12:55, Roy Marples wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 13:44:52 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 12:25, Roy Marples wrote:
On Tuesday 01 July 2008 13:01:56 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
ssd: do not stat -x EXECUTABLE, it is not needed anymore
Historically, surprising percentage of Unix admins
have no clue why $PATH is useful. Whenever they meet
a configuration problem causing PATH search to not find their
utility, they fix it by using full path.
Whereas correct fix is to fix $PATH or copy/move/symplink
executable to one of the
Index: modutils/Config.in
===
--- busybox-svn/modutils/Config.in (revision 22766)
+++ busybox-svn/modutils/Config.in (working copy)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
- rmmod is an alias to modprobe -r
- depmod generates
On Thursday 10 July 2008 18:34, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
Index: modutils/Config.in
===
--- busybox-svn/modutils/Config.in(revision 22766)
+++ busybox-svn/modutils/Config.in(working copy)
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
Hi,
I am trying to build Busybox v 1.11.0 with latest patches on arm9
processor using CodeSourcery arm9 toolchain.
Since using 1.11.0 version, i am getting an error saying, unable to find
file mkmakefile with error message as below
+ make ARCH=arm CROSS_COMPILE=arm-none-linux-gnueabi- xconfig
11 matches
Mail list logo
