Re: scripts/shell.c doesn't support '\0'

On 28/12/2021 20:07, Denys Vlasenko wrote: On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:00 PM Chris Boot wrote: On 28/12/2021 08:07, Denys Vlasenko wrote: It turns out that scripts/shell.c cannot output a NUL for the "\0" in the test string, thus breaking this test. What is scripts/shell.c? I don't see such

Re: scripts/shell.c doesn't support '\0'

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 12:00 PM Chris Boot wrote: > On 28/12/2021 08:07, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > >> It > >> turns out that scripts/shell.c cannot output a NUL for the "\0" in the > >> test string, thus breaking this test. > > > > What is scripts/shell.c? I don't see such a file. > > Sorry, I was

Re: scripts/shell.c doesn't support '\0'

On 28/12/2021 08:07, Denys Vlasenko wrote: On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 8:31 PM Chris Boot wrote: Hi all, I've started experimentally packaging BusyBox 1.35.0 for Debian, and found that the "awk printf('%c') can output NUL" test kept failing. Works for me. I would only expect it to fail if

scripts/shell.c doesn't support '\0'

Hi all, I've started experimentally packaging BusyBox 1.35.0 for Debian, and found that the "awk printf('%c') can output NUL" test kept failing. It turns out that scripts/shell.c cannot output a NUL for the "\0" in the test string, thus breaking this test. I had a quick look at