mine with the source. Perhaps you could help, Tito?
Thanks for your time and consideration everyone!
Chris
Hi,
I couldn't resist so I wrote and sent a patch to implement
-t radix option to the list.
Needs a little more testing, maybe you could take
a look at it.
Ciao,
Tito
PS.: improvements
On 10/14/2016 10:16 PM, Chris Renshaw wrote:
*From:*busybox on behalf of Tito
*Sent:* October 13, 2016 3:01 AM
*To:* busybox@busybox.net
*Subject:* Re: Subject: [PATCH] strings: Correct output to be decimal
per the help, instead of octal
On 10/12/2016 08:58 PM, Chris Renshaw wrote:
Hello
From: busybox on behalf of Tito
Sent: October 13, 2016 3:01 AM
To: busybox@busybox.net
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH] strings: Correct output to be decimal per the
help, instead of octal
On 10/12/2016 08:58 PM, Chris Renshaw wrote:
> Hello!
>
>
> They chose octal because they have
#x27;t top post.
*From:* busybox on behalf of Tito
*Sent:* October 11, 2016 3:38 PM
*To:* busybox@busybox.net
*Subject:* Re: Subject: [PATCH] strings: Correct output to be decimal
per the help, instead of octal
On 10/11/2016 04:00 PM, Chris Rensh
, but until then,
decimal is the more common (and more useful) output.
Cheers,
Chris
From: busybox on behalf of Tito
Sent: October 11, 2016 3:38 PM
To: busybox@busybox.net
Subject: Re: Subject: [PATCH] strings: Correct output to be decimal per the
help
On 10/11/2016 04:00 PM, Chris Renshaw wrote:
>>From fe9333ce1d69e292e14144a61ff88a23ffed0053 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Chris Renshaw
> Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 16:17:05 -0300
> Subject: [PATCH] strings: Correct output to be decimal per the help, instead
> of octal
> Most smaller/incomplete
