On 09/04/2009 11:56 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Larry Lansing wrote:
>
>> I have test code that proves that it successfully parses replies with
>> single and multiple SRV response records. (Tested it against a
>> capture from wireshark.)
>
> Thanks. And thanks Jakub Hrozek t
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Larry Lansing wrote:
I have test code that proves that it successfully parses replies with single
and multiple SRV response records. (Tested it against a capture from
wireshark.)
Thanks. And thanks Jakub Hrozek too of course.
Applied and committed just now.
--
/ danie
I have test code that proves that it successfully parses replies with
single and multiple SRV response records. (Tested it against a
capture from wireshark.)
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Larry Lansing wrote:
>
>> I have an immediate use for this pat
On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, Larry Lansing wrote:
I have an immediate use for this patch. Is there anything in particular
holding it up? Anything I can do to help?
You can tell us what you think about the patch and if you have tried it how it
works etc.
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
Greetings.
I have an immediate use for this patch. Is there anything in particular
holding it up? Anything I can do to help?
Jakub Hrozek wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 08/04/2009 03:48 PM, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On 08/03/2009 01:57 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
Sorry
