Hi ,
I was just going through the c-ares API 'ares_parse_srv_reply' and was
wondering why it doesn't parse the 'additional record' section present in
the SRV response.
As in a multi-threaded architecture where you may want to minimize the
overall number of DNS queries per second for better
Hi,
On 03/18/2013 09:26 AM, Alexander Klauer wrote:
OK, I've updated the commit.
sorry for being a pest, but this patchset still has not made it into the
master branch at https://github.com/bagder/c-ares/commits/master.
Is there still something wrong with it? What can I do to help?
Best
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
I implemented the first version of the SRV parsing and I must confess I no
longer remember why the additional record was not parsed, sorry.
I'm sure a patch would be welcome.
Oh indeed. Sounds like an excellent idea to me!
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
