On 05/02/2013 10:55 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Patrick Valsecchi wrote:
In attachment, you'll find my proposed patch for this problem.
Where do we stand on this one? Do I have to change something in this
proposed patch?
Can you please provide a full patch, including a s
On 05/02/2013 10:51 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Thu, 2 May 2013, Patrick Valsecchi wrote:
>
>> A colleague ran Coverity (a static analysis tool) against c-ares and fixed a
>> few reported errors and warnings.
>>
>> Please have a look at the attached patch.
>
> Thanks!
>
> There's a large amo
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013, Alexander Klauer wrote:
in the HTML pages mentioned in the subject, there are spurious '\fB'
sequences in the synopses. Possibly they have to be changed to '\fP' in the
source man pages, but I don't know enough roff to say for sure.
Thanks! It took me forever but I've now
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Patrick Valsecchi wrote:
In attachment, you'll find my proposed patch for this problem.
Where do we stand on this one? Do I have to change something in this
proposed patch?
Can you please provide a full patch, including a sensible commit message that
explains the change
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Patrick Valsecchi wrote:
A colleague ran Coverity (a static analysis tool) against c-ares and fixed a
few reported errors and warnings.
Please have a look at the attached patch.
Thanks!
There's a large amount of added typecasts for malloc() and a few other void
pointers
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Alex Loukissas wrote:
Since I figured out the issue, I thought I'd share the patch with you. Feel
free to use it.
Thanks, merged and pushed!
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
