On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Karl Palsson wrote:
No problem. I totally agree that they _should_ I was just curious whether
it was really c-ares's job to be _enforcing_ that. It feels a little out of
scope, and I haven't come across any other projects doing so. It's also
handled by special m4 macros
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Stenberg wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> > if a project supports a separation between CPPFLAGS and CFLAGS, then -I,
> > -U,
> > -D and friends should indeed be passed in CPPFLAGS.
>
> I'm bound to agree. I would like
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Peter Pentchev wrote:
if a project supports a separation between CPPFLAGS and CFLAGS, then -I, -U,
-D and friends should indeed be passed in CPPFLAGS.
I'm bound to agree. I would like a stronger use case that really cannot adapt
to that rule before loosening our checks.
