On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, David Drysdale wrote:
I kind of assumed you wouldn't want to distribute the test suite; OTOH
verifying an install with it would be helpful.
Yes, I generally believe in shipping "everything" so that tarball users can do
virtually all the same things as git users can. And w
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
Good idea! It made me realize the test suite isn't bundled in the dist
archive so I'll just fix that first...
Okay, here we go:
http://c-ares.haxx.se/daily-snapshot/c-ares-1.11.0-rc1.tar.gz
This is also tagged in git as "cares-1_11_0-rc1". This sna
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Gregor Jasny wrote:
If you would create some kind of release candidate I could test it in Debian
Experimental against all architectures.
Good idea! It made me realize the test suite isn't bundled in the dist archive
so I'll just fix that first...
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
Hello,
On 11/02/16 11:22, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016, Gregor Jasny wrote:
Would it make sense to create a new release?
I hereby nominate Febrary 19th (Friday next week) as release date.
If you would create some kind of release candidate I could test it in
Debian Experimenta
Hi friends,
I would like some input from Windows-fluent people on this pull request with
the subject as shown above:
https://github.com/c-ares/c-ares/pull/17
--
/ daniel.haxx.se
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016, Gregor Jasny wrote:
Would it make sense to create a new release?
I hereby nominate Febrary 19th (Friday next week) as release date. This
assumes that we will not merge any new features and be careful with bug fixes
as well - until then.
If you agree, silence is fine. If
