Hi,
the reason is simple, it don't extract domains/search list anymore.
Small patch using GetAdaptersAddresses&GetNetworkParams is attached, but
it dosn't contain code reading lists from Windows registry, but only
comments where and when to do that.
--
Yours sincerely, Eugeny.
GM of Enterpri
On 01/25/2017 02:18 AM, David Guillen Fandos wrote:
Hello,
I wrote an app that was crashing in c-ares due to fds being bigger than
1024. While c-ares might be using around 30 fds it is unable to use fds
above 1024.
no, that's not a truth. you may use any socket number on all modern UNIX
syst
On 01/31/2017 07:28 PM, Zan Lynx wrote:
On 01/31/2017 06:41 AM, eugeny gladkih wrote:
no, that's not a truth. you may use any socket number on all modern UNIX
systems. the only thing you need - you have to allocate enough memory
for fd_set. one more thing you have to know is still her
On 02/01/2017 07:57 PM, Zan Lynx wrote:
On 02/01/2017 05:32 AM, eugeny gladkih wrote:
I would certainly not assume that I can just redefine FD_SETSIZE without
double-checking.
that was a piece of production code. it works well.
Well yes I am sure it does. In Solaris.
I looked at glibc
On 02/03/2017 05:43 PM, eugeny gladkih wrote:
I would certainly not assume that I can just redefine FD_SETSIZE
without
double-checking.
that was a piece of production code. it works well.
Well yes I am sure it does. In Solaris.
I looked at glibc select() code just now and it doesn't
On 23.04.2018 22:00, Brad Spencer wrote:
I've posted a pull request to GitHub that fixes possible undefined
behaviour in the computation of request timeouts and changes how
timeouts are calculated.
https://github.com/c-ares/c-ares/pull/187
What do people think?
that's great, but we need an
Hi,
> On 18 Nov 2020, at 10:52, Daniel Stenberg wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As some of you noticed, the 1.17.0 release was slightly borked and there will
> soon be a patch release made. Thanks for your understanding and cooperation!
>
there are more problems:
CCLD libcares.la
Making all in too
