Re: followup on email about nested directories..

2005-03-17 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Mark Crispin wrote: In order to create mailboxes within a mailbox, you need to use a mailbox format which supports this dual-use. mbx format is not such a format; nor is traditional UNIX mailbox format. The dual-use mailbox formats supported in the distribution version of

Re: Configuration problems

2004-12-22 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Erich Beyrent wrote: I am running FreeBSD 5.3 and have built the latest version of imap. My problem is that I cannot seem to get IMAP to download any messages to my Outlook client. POP3 is working correctly - in my $HOME directory, I have a .mail file containing all the

Re: using mtest to understand c-client

2004-12-06 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Andrew Biggs wrote: I'm just getting started using c-client, and was trying to use mtest to talk to an IMAP server on another box. Looking at the code, it's not real clear to me how to specify the remote address, username, password, etc. I didn't see any readme's, FAQ's, or

Re: reopening a stream with OP_HALFOPEN

2004-12-02 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: ... but - are you saying that I don't even need to change into HALFOPEN mode in order to be able to append messages to any kind of mailbox without the Status: O flag being set? That I just have

reopening a stream with OP_HALFOPEN

2004-12-01 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
I've got reports [1] against Debian's version of c-client 2002e that when opening a stream, that is not OP_HALFOPEN (such as OP_READONLY or NIL), c-client will actually close and open the stream again (thus requiring the user to re-authenticate). Is this: * a known problem? * a feature with a

Re: reopening a stream with OP_HALFOPEN

2004-12-01 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: On Wed, 1 Dec 2004, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: I've got reports [1] against Debian's version of c-client 2002e that when opening a stream, that is not OP_HALFOPEN (such as OP_READONLY or NIL), c-client will actually close and open the stream

Re: mh not keeping flags intact when doing a check

2004-06-11 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: On Thu, 10 Jun 2004, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: But I don't understand what would be required to fix it. I can't see the big picture. AFAI can see mh_ping is not changing the status of messages. mh format does not have any place

Re: mh not keeping flags intact when doing a check

2004-06-11 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Mark Crispin wrote: On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: The problem I'm fighting against here is that when reopening a connection the c-client's mh driver will loose knowledge of which messages were removed. That problem is insurmountable

Re: open_mail, flags and synchronization

2004-06-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
Since Mark seems to be listening on the list, but there's no reply yet: let's make the requirements a bit lighter and ask some more specific questions. I'll cut this email in two, since it is two different questions actually. On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: I'm trying

mh not keeping flags intact when doing a check

2004-06-10 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Wed, 9 Jun 2004, Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: Second question: some of my MH users say that re-mail_open'ing a MH store will make it forget all all removal flags. Is this a known bug/problem/feature. Is there a work around or should I try to fix c-clients source

open_mail, flags and synchronization

2004-06-09 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
I'm trying to fix mailsync a mail synchronizer to properly work wrt to flags. I'm trying to accomplish this by using c-client. I need to: * read the headers in box A * read the headers in box B * determine from the header which emails I have already seen in what inbox (same algorithm CVS is

Re: Anyone with MH patches?

2004-02-28 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Erik Berls wrote: I've looked through the mail archives and I've seen support issues for MH folders come up numerous times. I was wondering if anyone had patches that implemented the ability to maintain the read/un-read status of messages. Ideally, I would prefer if

Re: imap: How to avoid folder creation?

2003-02-27 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote: If the users can only have their INBOX on imap but not any other folders what do they gain from this change. They can move mails back and forth to and from the server, which is impossible with pop. *t --

Re: imap: How to avoid folder creation?

2003-02-27 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote: Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists wrote: On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote: If the users can only have their INBOX on imap but not any other folders what do they gain from this change. They can move mails back and forth

Status: O

2002-09-23 Thread Tomas Pospisek's Mailing Lists
I'm trying to sync mail from an IMAP server to a /var/spool/mail/mbox [1]. The problem is, that mail_append[_full] will allways add a Status: O to the mail, even if I pass an empty string to the function as flags. The problem with this is that the mutt MUA interprets Status: O as an